Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can we have a "Preview Post" button in the Quick Reply form?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31

    Comment


    • #32
      Trying to prove a point are we, John?
      Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
      Then why call him God? - Epicurus

      Comment


      • #33

        Comment


        • #34
          Attached Files
          I love being beaten by women - Lorizael

          Comment


          • #35
            Attached Files
            I'm consitently stupid- Japher
            I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by DrSpike
              Can't you just read your post before hitting post reply?
              You can. But the formatting tags can be quite a mess sometimes. Without a preview, it is very hard to know for sure that they work as intended.

              I proposed a preview feature for PMs a while ago exactly for this reason. You can not edit a PM after it is sent...
              Seriously. Kung freaking fu.

              Comment


              • #37
                For some Mingapulco is neither an adventure nor a vacation. It's a way of life.

                Comment


                • #38
                  I proposed a preview feature for PMs a while ago exactly for this reason. You can not edit a PM after it is sent...


                  You can, however, delete PMs that have been sent, but have not been read by the recipient. I just delete the PM, and copy and paste the original message into a new PM, and then send it after I have finished altering the text.
                  You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    /me quick replies:

                    I would rather have a Preview for editting posts. Quick reply is just that.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      I support JohnT's motion.

                      Previews and donuts for the masses!
                      Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                      It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                      The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I say why bother? If yer quick reply turns into a report, cut n' paste into a 'post reply'.
                        I'm consitently stupid- Japher
                        I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Krill
                          You can, however, delete PMs that have been sent, but have not been read by the recipient. I just delete the PM, and copy and paste the original message into a new PM, and then send it after I have finished altering the text.
                          Case in point.

                          Or do you think what you describe looks user-friendly?
                          Seriously. Kung freaking fu.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by JohnT
                            About there being more spam in the ACS forum than in the whole OT put together.
                            Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                            Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              False

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by alva


                                About there being more spam in the ACS forum than in the whole OT put together.
                                Ahh. I wasn't spamming the forum, I was just responding to people as they replied. My apologies.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X