cool
I re-read the thread and the vote on Holds is 4-3 in favor of keeping them, but my vote is the difference. And I aint really that particular IF we can make up for the loss of a relevant pitching category. If we're replacing Holds, the replacement needs to be better. I dont see many options, hell, I'm looking at epw's first list and it aint looking bad. Anyway, the vote is fairly close
so lets have a vote on this
R, 1B, 2B,3B,HR, SB, RBI, OBP, SLG
QS, SV, HLD, K, K/BB, H/9, BB/9, ERA (I split up WHIP to keep the cats close)
or
R, H, HR, RBI, SB, TB, OBP, SLG
QS, SV, HLD, K, K/BB, WHIP ERA
I'd rather have wins and whip in option 1, winning is what its all about.
VOTE
I like both, if we're tied on the vote I'll decide it like the VP residing over the Senate
SO VOTE AGAIN
I re-read the thread and the vote on Holds is 4-3 in favor of keeping them, but my vote is the difference. And I aint really that particular IF we can make up for the loss of a relevant pitching category. If we're replacing Holds, the replacement needs to be better. I dont see many options, hell, I'm looking at epw's first list and it aint looking bad. Anyway, the vote is fairly close
so lets have a vote on this
R, 1B, 2B,3B,HR, SB, RBI, OBP, SLG
QS, SV, HLD, K, K/BB, H/9, BB/9, ERA (I split up WHIP to keep the cats close)
or
R, H, HR, RBI, SB, TB, OBP, SLG
QS, SV, HLD, K, K/BB, WHIP ERA
I'd rather have wins and whip in option 1, winning is what its all about.
VOTE
I like both, if we're tied on the vote I'll decide it like the VP residing over the Senate
SO VOTE AGAIN
Comment