Which Amendments should be ignored?

[Dauphin]

1st and 2nd Amendment must be defended according to Trump and Musk. 14th can be ignored because, well foreigners having babies in the US is bad. Seems pretty clear cut:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside

Anyone know which amendments must be followed according to Trump, and which ones we should pretend don't exist?

[giblets]

He'll have his own take on the 22nd amendment before long.

[BeBMan]

I checked a list of all amendments, and they all seem to be from the Biden era. Very suspicious.

Also, it looks like there's a plot brewing within the Musk orbit to take guns away.

I mean, why else would they want to drastically reduce government? One of the main arguments for them guns has been IIRC that they're needed in case the gov does something bad. So reducing the gov is surely aimed to make that reasoning irrelevant, since a much smaller gov isn't much of a threat.

I read this on TikTok, because the MSM does not dare to cover the story

[EPW]

The civil war amendments have to go

[BeBMan]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside

I just realized that there's a hidden pro-immigrant agenda here.

Obviously there are plans to accept only US citizens which are not born in the US.

[Lorizael]

1st, 4th, 6th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 12th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 18th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th

All these amendments are unnecessary, either because you can get them using other amendments or because the mere fact of there being successive amendments implies their existence.

[Dauphin]

I'll give you 18th and 21st. They can probably both go.

[Dinner]

None?