Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Politics Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by BeBMan View Post
    I think anyone accused of murder post-Jack the Ripper is basically innocent because they can always point to Jack the Ripper having murdered ppl before. Of course Jack the Ripper could point to ppl being murderers before him, but then it's Jack the Ripper, and who on earth would believe this guy?
    He was never convicted, so we must conclude he was innocent.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    All vaccines work the same way. They train your immune system to recognize a pathogen. The effectiveness depends upon how accurately the vaccine pathogen matches the actual pathogen a person encounters and the vagaries of a particular persona’s immune system. Everyone was told this. Vaccines do not guarantee that any particular individual will not get sick nor do they guarantee that anyone can be prevented from transmitting a disease. Again, everyone was told this.

  • Ming
    replied
    The Maga nonsense continues...

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post

    You are guilty of some crime (sexual predator, paedophile, etc). An accuser comes forward and you are under pressure. Hire someone to make similar but more bombastic allegations. Demonstrate their allegations are without merit or have them recant. Doubt is placed on the instances of actual crimes. Spread enough **** everywhere and no-one knows what to believe or just doesn't believe any of it - even the parts that are true.
    Maybe QAnon played that role. Whenever multiple media outlets all focus on the same 'story' somebody might be establishing a narrative to distract, like how Russia and Trump became the story when Democrat emails were leaked showing them rigging their own elections.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    How does this one work and why weren't we told? That doctor was right and the unlicensed women of the view accused her of being a shill spreading misinformation and should be censored. The you might be a redneck guy should do a new routine, you might have TDS if you think Tony Fauci achieved sainthood.

  • BeBMan
    replied
    I think anyone accused of murder post-Jack the Ripper is basically innocent because they can always point to Jack the Ripper having murdered ppl before. Of course Jack the Ripper could point to ppl being murderers before him, but then it's Jack the Ripper, and who on earth would believe this guy?

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    It is possible to get and maintain a doctors license without knowing how vaccines work.

  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
    "The court documents show that Sarah Ransome, an Epstein victim, stated that Trump had relations with "many girls" and that Epstein kept blackmail videos of Trump, Richard Branson, Prince Andrew and Clinton. She claimed to possess the videos Sarah Ransome also called Trump a "Paedophile [Pedophile] in an email. She eventually retracted her comments saying: "no good" would come from sharing her claims to the public. "I want to walk away from this... I shouldn't have contacted you and I'm sorry I wasted your time. It's not worth coming forward and I will never be heard anyhow and only bad things will happen as a consequence of me going public."

    Epstein Files
    You are guilty of some crime (sexual predator, paedophile, etc). An accuser comes forward and you are under pressure. Hire someone to make similar but more bombastic allegations. Demonstrate their allegations are without merit or have them recant. Doubt is placed on the instances of actual crimes. Spread enough **** everywhere and no-one knows what to believe or just doesn't believe any of it - even the parts that are true.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied


    The women of The View accused a doctor of misinformation for claiming the vaccine didn't prevent infection and transmission. Joy Behar was jabbed several times and got covid.

    a doctor said they could have easily tested for transmission... maybe they did and knew it didn't prevent the spread of covid and withheld the knowledge. They lied to us and vaccinated people got infected and took covid home to their uninfected loved ones who were then blamed for getting infected.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    "The court documents show that Sarah Ransome, an Epstein victim, stated that Trump had relations with "many girls" and that Epstein kept blackmail videos of Trump, Richard Branson, Prince Andrew and Clinton. She claimed to possess the videos Sarah Ransome also called Trump a "Paedophile [Pedophile] in an email. She eventually retracted her comments saying: "no good" would come from sharing her claims to the public. "I want to walk away from this... I shouldn't have contacted you and I'm sorry I wasted your time. It's not worth coming forward and I will never be heard anyhow and only bad things will happen as a consequence of me going public."

    Epstein Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
    With the ouster of Claudine Gay as prez of Harvard comes another feeding frenzy. Some rich guy who pushed to fire her is married to a woman with plagiarism in her past lol. Oh boy, glass houses. The Billionaire Bill Ackman is now pissed off at Business Insider for asking his wife about the accusation. He attacked her so somebody went after his wife and he's angry because family is supposed to be off limits unless they're involved. And in this case I agree, she isn't involved. Nevertheless, she isn't really the issue, he is. He's the one using plagiarism to drive the Harvard prez out of office.

    What do ya think?
    I think if plagiarism is unacceptable it needs consequences when it comes to light. If consequences aren't necessary then it should be made acceptable. It makes perfect sense that people connected to those who have faced consequences for plagiarism would be the first to raise the hue and cry when they see someone else apparently getting away with it.

    I think if someone's glass house was smashed in we shouldn't be surprised when they are quick to smash in other glass houses especially if the people living in them have the same job descriptions as the people who took it on themselves to smash their glass house in the first place.
    Last edited by Geronimo; January 8, 2024, 09:45. Reason: Duplicate word hopefully not suspicious to remove

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    With the ouster of Claudine Gay as prez of Harvard comes another feeding frenzy. Some rich guy who pushed to fire her is married to a woman with plagiarism in her past lol. Oh boy, glass houses. The Billionaire Bill Ackman is now pissed off at Business Insider for asking his wife about the accusation. He attacked her so somebody went after his wife and he's angry because family is supposed to be off limits unless they're involved. And in this case I agree, she isn't involved. Nevertheless, she isn't really the issue, he is. He's the one using plagiarism to drive the Harvard prez out of office.

    What do ya think?

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied
    Let Putin travel more and find out about it

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    commented on 's reply
    And I’m sure that if Trump had been alive in 1862, he could have negotiated away the US Civil War too.

  • Geronimo
    commented on 's reply
    Many Democrat office holders have worked publicly to materially support and defend the entirety of the BLM movement as a group and as a movement *not* as in support of individuals
Working...
X