Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roe is gone! :D

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by N35t0r View Post

    I'm sure you would have opposed independence in 1776.
    Independence was a mistake.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by My Wife Hates CIV View Post
      when will the violence start? the violence dems somehow justify.
      Start? The Right has been bombing abortion clinics for decades.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #33
        *mumbles something about thoughts and prayers.
        Blah

        Comment


        • #34
          Let's hope the ****stain that is the OP never has a daughter that gets pregnant... otherwise he will have to pay for an abortion in a state that allows it...
          "Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."

          Comment


          • #35
            1. This place did not need BK to come back. Gonna get that out of the way first.
            2. Yay, the damn thing's dead, now we can work on repairing the damage fifty years of it did to our politics.
            3. It's not 1972 so most illegal abortions will now be done with smuggled pills; septic mutilated corpses will be few and far between.
            4. This doesn't do a whole lot to change the status quo; the states which will make this illegal are states that already made it nearly impossible to run an abortion clinic efficiently. These states will go from one or two clinics each to zero, and women will have to drive a little farther to snuff their kids in utero.
            5. The leak probably did us a favor by letting out the pressure slowly; I'm aware of only one real riot so far, in Phoenix.
            6. All the other ass-pull decisions based on the same kind of reasoning (Lawrence, Griswold, Obergefell, etc.) are in fact endangered by this precedent, even if they're way less controversial than Roe and most of the judges are not interested in messing with them at present. We should respond to this by codifying our expectations in actual law instead of relying on nine unelected officials to run our democracy for us.
            1011 1100
            Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Elok View Post
              4. This doesn't do a whole lot to change the status quo; the states which will make this illegal are states that already made it nearly impossible to run an abortion clinic efficiently. These states will go from one or two clinics each to zero, and women will have to drive a little farther to snuff their kids in utero.
              Pro-life activists didn't fight for 50 years to not change the status quo a whole lot. That's why Pence is calling for a national abortion ban and some are trying to make it illegal to travel out of state to get an abortion.
              Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
              "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
                Pro-life activists didn't fight for 50 years to not change the status quo a whole lot. That's why Pence is calling for a national abortion ban and some are trying to make it illegal to travel out of state to get an abortion.
                Kavanaugh already explicitly ruled out the second and I don't see it passing without him, even assuming it's enforceable. As for the national ban, congress flips enough that I don't see it lasting long before people get tired of the farce of legal/illegal/legal. If it does stick around, I expect non-compliant states' attorneys to neutralize it, same as they do with marijuana. We're going to wind up, one way or another, with moderate restrictions more or less consistent with what the nation thinks reasonable, which is less restrictive than I want but better than the mess caused by Roe.
                1011 1100
                Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                Comment


                • #38
                  So according to what my Twitter feed tells me, SCOTUS believes life begins at conception and ends in mass shooting.
                  One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Elok View Post

                    Kavanaugh already explicitly ruled out the second and I don't see it passing without him, even assuming it's enforceable. As for the national ban, congress flips enough that I don't see it lasting long before people get tired of the farce of legal/illegal/legal. If it does stick around, I expect non-compliant states' attorneys to neutralize it, same as they do with marijuana. We're going to wind up, one way or another, with moderate restrictions more or less consistent with what the nation thinks reasonable, which is less restrictive than I want but better than the mess caused by Roe.
                    I know you have a different perspective than pro-choice people, but try to imagine how unpersuasive and unreassuring "don't worry, only some of your bodily autonomy is being taken away, and probably not as much as we'd like" is.
                    Last edited by Lorizael; June 25, 2022, 10:36.
                    Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                    "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Last edited by My Wife Hates CIV; July 4, 2022, 00:37.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Yeah, men manage to not get pregnant alllll the time...
                        No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Pro life, btw. Just hate that kind of "reasoning".
                          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Elok View Post

                            Kavanaugh already explicitly ruled out the second and I don't see it passing without him, even assuming it's enforceable. As for the national ban, congress flips enough that I don't see it lasting long before people get tired of the farce of legal/illegal/legal. If it does stick around, I expect non-compliant states' attorneys to neutralize it, same as they do with marijuana. We're going to wind up, one way or another, with moderate restrictions more or less consistent with what the nation thinks reasonable, which is less restrictive than I want but better than the mess caused by Roe.
                            What do you think will happen if Trump or someone similar wins in 2024?

                            JM
                            Jon Miller-
                            I AM.CANADIAN
                            GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Elok View Post
                              6. All the other ass-pull decisions based on the same kind of reasoning (Lawrence, Griswold, Obergefell, etc.) are in fact endangered by this precedent, even if they're way less controversial than Roe and most of the judges are not interested in messing with them at present. We should respond to this by codifying our expectations in actual law instead of relying on nine unelected officials to run our democracy for us.
                              I sort of agree, but I also am conservative so I am concerned about the results of change. I don't think we should make some drastic changes without considering the consequences (same with Roe).

                              JM
                              Last edited by Jon Miller; June 25, 2022, 12:51.
                              Jon Miller-
                              I AM.CANADIAN
                              GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I am pro-life if you consider the Oregon law or similar. I am pro-choice if you consider current Missouri? law.

                                I am not sure if this is actually going to reduce abortions after brainwaves much.

                                JM
                                (brain waves are 6 weeks, viability is 21 weeks or so, I think that anywhere between the two is reasonable right now)
                                Last edited by Jon Miller; June 25, 2022, 12:58.
                                Jon Miller-
                                I AM.CANADIAN
                                GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X