Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prediction Thread: When Will Ukraine Conquer Russia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dinner
    replied
    Are you still lying about mythical "coup" which followed the constitutional process to the letter?

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    He did a video on what provoked the war and didn't mention the 2014 coup to overthrow the democratically elected president popular in the east or the right wing violence against protesters and ethnic Russians. Dont you think that omission is conspicuous? We backed a massacre and unleashed fanatics on Ukraine to bleed Russia with a proxy war on their border. I wonder what that guy would say if Russia did that to our neighbor.

    He also argues Zelensky is a sufficient rebuttal to Azov's influence. It was Azov that led the attack on the east in 2014, Zelensky told people he'd end the war so they elected him in 2019 but he had no effect on policy. Obviously. Do you believe Joe Biden wanted this war?

    And then he dismisses talk of Nazis by pointing out Russia knows about them too so that makes it propaganda. So did western media after that coup you didn't mention. I'm sure if Latvia hosts Nato missiles aimed at Moscow Russia will feel threatened, look at what we did in Cuba.
    Last edited by Berzerker; May 23, 2023, 02:15.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    For Berz,

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
    Speaking of distractions, apparently there was an incursion into Russian territory in the vicinity of Belgorad, by something called "The Freedom of Russia Legion". "Territory was captured".
    Apparently they had at least one tank

    Leave a comment:


  • The Mad Monk
    replied
    Speaking of distractions, apparently there was an incursion into Russian territory in the vicinity of Belgorad, by something called "The Freedom of Russia Legion". "Territory was captured".

    Leave a comment:


  • The Mad Monk
    replied
    Prigozhin(sp) announced that Wagner had taken Bahkmut, and in the same video, stated that they will stay there until the 25th and then pull out entirely, leaving the defense to the Russian MOD.

    So, if anything, it's the Russian army that's getting encircled.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by pchang View Post
    Wagner may have put themselves into an encirclement.
    I am skeptical Ukraine can pull that off given the geography. I think Bakhmut is more of a distraction and they really need to be making a breakthrough in the south.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied
    Originally posted by pchang View Post
    Wagner may have put themselves into an encirclement.
    Taking out Wagner would be a step towards denazification.

    Leave a comment:


  • pchang
    replied
    Wagner may have put themselves into an encirclement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    Oh, a part landed. Anyway, you seem to miss some weights here - what is 600 kg compared to a damaged missile ?
    Originally posted by Serb View Post
    About the same. Kinzhal weiths over 500 kg, iirc.
    And missile is damaged not by the whole body of SAM, but by it's shards after the explosion nearby the target.

    You don't know a ****!, that is simple!
    You are an idiot, farting to the pond.

    Period.
    I think Serb is either simply trolling and doesn't care if the trolling will be deeply unflattering for his intellect or else he is not reading and comprehending our posts explaining this to him and just ​regurgitates the most superficially related propaganda that he has been shown on his media shows which have an "opposing" western Simplicio stooge put in their place by the totally untainted by dishonest propaganda Russian state endorsed expert's irrefutable logic and knowledge.

    Trying to reason with him on this issue may indeed be about as effective and worthwhile as farting in a pond.

    Synopsis: hypersonic speeds create an an enormous amount of drag at all altitudes below ~90km. Enormous drag can be managed by carefully engineering surfaces to minimize the drag and to control and manage the enormous stresses that such drag can place on an airframe. If the surfaces are damaged, enormous local stresses caused by the now poorly managed drag forces at the point(s) of damage cause near immediate structural failures at the point of damage spreading the damage until the airframe breaks to pieces. The pieces, which have a massively increased overall surface area, expend massive kinetic energy in hypervelocity atmospheric interactions and slow to subsonic speeds in seconds and to terminal velocity several seconds after that. If the hypersonic object was more than several seconds freefall from the ground at the start of the damage the pieces will impact the ground at each piece's individual terminal velocity.

    If the above amounts to farting in a pond, that is Serb's fault.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by BlackCat View Post
    Serb, you are soo funny - the Chelyabinsk meteor​ in total weighted 10.000 tons and you are showing a video of rescuing 600 kilo ? Les just make it a bit funnier - these 10 kton traveled at a speed of 69 kkm - more or less 7 times the speed of your "indestructable" rockets.
    Thank you BackCat for your exemplary efforts to explain the basic problems with Serb's continued assertions that a Kinzhal has to create a crater larger than 1.5 meters if it is intercepted at any point on its trajectory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    I'm hearing Bakhmut has fallen to criminals armed with shovels

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied
    I think he's not thinking it through al lot, and will just counter anything with a "Russia is better in this or that". Basically what we all did for our pet sides during our childhood

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    I think I have figured out something on how Serb sees military technology and hardware. The Patriot, for example has been around since the 1990's. Serb sees that as a static system still using equipment, software, and missiles from that era. An interesting, but understandable mistake for someone from Russia. I suppose that if this is the Russian way then that explains why Russian military equipment is crap. Today's Patriot bears little resemblance to the 1990s Patriot. In fact, far from obsolete, the updated Patriot is one the most modern and effective air defense weapons in existence. Serb uses the same logic with nuclear missiles. He naturally assumes that they have been sitting in silos untouched since the 1980s.

    Apparently Russian systems must not get regular updates and enhancements. Serb, you can rest assured that U.S. systems are as modern as anybody's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geronimo
    replied
    Originally posted by Serb View Post

    Hmm, only a puppets are in NATO.
    The really independent countries want to join BRICS.


    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...5.cms?from=mdr
    That's a good point. BRICS is for countries that want to be really independent. As such membership in BRICS is quite meaningless as an indication of implied support and alliance in the sense that so far the organization offers zero commitments to support anyone.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X