Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Newly released documents maybe evidence of "insurance policy."

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Aeson View Post

    "The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication."
    But Brennan briefed Obama on it. That indicates that it was vetted. Unless Brennan fed him disinformation.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
      I'll eat my hat if Obama didn't know
      That isn't what is in question. The claim ahainst Hillary was information obtained from Russian intelligence that US IC could not corroborate.

      Obama was briefed on it. Sent it to the FBI to investigate. Senate Judiciary Committee was informed. 4 years later ... 0 indictments even though "lock her up" Trump had his picks for FBI and Justice, Rs controlled Senate, and for 2 years Rs controlled House.

      Comment


      • -Jrabbit
        -Jrabbit commented
        Editing a comment
        Yeah, Kid and Berz still can't explain that whole side of things.

      • Kidlicious
        Kidlicious commented
        Editing a comment
        There's actually 1 indictment. This isn't about counting indictments. It's about what they did. Maybe they don't get indictment. Stop trying to make this out to be something other than what they did.

    • Originally posted by Aeson View Post

      That isn't what is in question. The claim ahainst Hillary was information obtained from Russian intelligence that US IC could not corroborate.

      Obama was briefed on it. Sent it to the FBI to investigate. Senate Judiciary Committee was informed. 4 years later ... 0 indictments even though "lock her up" Trump had his picks for FBI and Justice, Rs controlled Senate, and for 2 years Rs controlled House.
      You're making this difficult. One document that was declassified said that the information wasn't verified. That doesn't mean that it wasn't ever verified. Brennan told the President about it. We now know that from other documents (Brennan's notes). The Dir of CIA does not give the President unverified information. Therefore it was verified when the President received it.

      It is not illegal to lie about political opponents. That's why Hillary is not charged for any crime.

      But it is crooked as hell, and down right wicked for all these people to do this to America and everyone they have personally harmed.
      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

      Comment


      • oh... In that case...nevermind

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

          The Dir of CIA does not give the President unverified information. Therefore it was verified when the President received it.
          Presidents are briefed on matters that are not certain all the time. FBI is literally the Federal Bureau that investigates such (domestic) matters.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Aeson View Post

            Presidents are briefed on matters that are not certain all the time. FBI is literally the Federal Bureau that investigates such (domestic) matters.
            They aren't given information before the intelligence community checks it out. What do you think they do, give him unverified information, so he can ask them if they tried to verify it? No they try to verify it. There is nothing in Brennan's note that indicates that they never tried to verify it, and then it was sent over to the FBI.

            It was sent to the FBI to conduct a counterintelligence investigation, not to verify Brennan's information. The FBI doesn't work for the CIA. The CIA can not investigate such matters. But they verify information.
            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

            Comment


            • Where are you getting the claim that it was investigated by the FBI btw. I just watched a clip of Brennan on CNN justifying that it wasn't sent to the FBI because there weren't any laws broke. Of course it should have been sent for counterintelligence investigation since the Russians were colluding with Hillary.
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment


              • -Jrabbit
                -Jrabbit commented
                Editing a comment
                All this coming from a guy who supports our Putin-worshipping President, whose entire campaign was run by Russia-connected lobbyists, grifters and thieves - many of whom have actually been tried and convicted of actual crimes - unlike anyone in the Obama administration. Never has a POTUS has to spend so much political capital to protect himself by pardoning guilty members of his own campaign staff and administration. It's laughably embarrassing.

                Donald J. Trump has clearly worked to hinder all investigations against him, and his ongoing refusal to show the public his taxes and financials are far more damning than the nothingburger of distraction that this "investigation" represents. At the very least, Donald Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice.

              • Berzerker
                Berzerker commented
                Editing a comment
                Was Trump worshiping Putin when he authorized selling anti-tank Javelins to Ukraine when Obama refused? I believe Trump has pardoned only Stone who was neither staff or administration, Reagan had a bunch of people pardoned over Iran Contra.

              • -Jrabbit
                -Jrabbit commented
                Editing a comment
                Cherry-picking. Do you seriously believe that Trump is not acting preferentially in Russia's obvious interest? Do you seriously believe that his massive debt (reportedly $421 million) is not largely held by Russian interests?

            • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

              They aren't given information before the intelligence community checks it out. What do you think they do, give him unverified information, so he can ask them if they tried to verify it? No they try to verify it. There is nothing in Brennan's note that indicates that they never tried to verify it, and then it was sent over to the FBI.

              It was sent to the FBI to conduct a counterintelligence investigation, not to verify Brennan's information. The FBI doesn't work for the CIA. The CIA can not investigate such matters. But they verify information.
              "The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication."

              That was in the letter sent to the Senate Judiciary AFTER Obama was briefed. Not just shortly after ... 4 YEARS AFTER THE IC STILL CANNOT CORROBORATE THE RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE ACCORDING TO Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.

              The IC includes the CIA and FBI as well as other agencies.

              Your claim that Obama wouldn't be briefed on something that wasn't already proven is clearly false. It obviously happened. 4 years after the briefing THE INFORMATION HE WAS BRIEFED ON IS STILL UNVERIFIED.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
                Where are you getting the claim that it was investigated by the FBI btw. I just watched a clip of Brennan on CNN justifying that it wasn't sent to the FBI because there weren't any laws broke. Of course it should have been sent for counterintelligence investigation since the Russians were colluding with Hillary.
                From the article you linked to. You should try reading it.

                "On 07 September 2016, U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey ..."

                Comment


                • Brennan's notes were just declassified, that is, after the letter sent to the Senate Judiciary. Radcliff declassified the notes because Democrats are making this out to be disinformation. There is no evidence of it being disinformation. Why would Brennan feed the President disinformation? And without checking it out? That makes no sense.
                  I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                  - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Aeson View Post

                    From the article you linked to. You should try reading it.

                    "On 07 September 2016, U.S. intelligence officials forwarded an investigative referral to FBI Director James Comey ..."
                    Did you also read that the President's advisors aren't supposed to give him possible Russian disinformation?

                    It was sent to the FBI, for counterintelligence investigation. It was sent to Comey and Strzok, the counterintelligence head. We have no evidence that they conducted any investigation.
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • Also, Comey testified under oath that he doesn't remember learning about the information. Probably a lie, but if an investigation was conducted then he is caught lying under oath.
                      I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                      - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Aeson View Post

                        That isn't what is in question. The claim ahainst Hillary was information obtained from Russian intelligence that US IC could not corroborate.

                        Obama was briefed on it. Sent it to the FBI to investigate. Senate Judiciary Committee was informed. 4 years later ... 0 indictments even though "lock her up" Trump had his picks for FBI and Justice, Rs controlled Senate, and for 2 years Rs controlled House.
                        So it wasn't investigated, and Fox News says their source tells them that many people in Congress have requested this document and never received it. We only have it now because the President authorized its declasification.

                        "Another source familiar with the documents told Fox News that "this information has been sought by hundreds of congressional requests for legitimate oversight purposes and was withheld for political spite—and the belief that they’d never get caught."

                        The source added that the Brennan notes are significant because it is “their own words, written and memorialized in real time.”
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment


                      • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                        Did you also read that the President's advisors aren't supposed to give him possible Russian disinformation?
                        Factual claims by Trump's DNI:

                        4 years ago Obama was briefed on this.
                        4 years ago it was referred to the FBI.
                        4 years later the intelligence is not corroborated.

                        Reasonable conclusions:

                        - Obama was briefed on it before it was verified.
                        - Kid and author of right wing propaganda source don't understand the way time works.

                        Comment


                        • why didn't Trump release all this stuff years ago?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X