Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brexit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dinner
    replied
    Me: Chicken is safer when it is treated with chlorine and their is absolutely no scientificially based negative effects.

    Stupid person: Total food borne illnesses are higher in the US (including not just chicken but EVERY SINGLE ****ING LAST ONE of every food product) when we include post purchase handling of all food products.

    Me: Those are not remotely the same and you are an idiot trying to avoid my original fact based claim.

    Stupid person: Durrrrrrr!

    Me: Now, get your shoe shine box, boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
    You know I am not Australian? Right?
    That does not matter. You're "evidenc" is garbage, it doesn't remotely measure the same thing, so your claim can and should be rejected out of hand. Hell, even The Economist said it was inconsequential nonsense from stupid people who do not understand that the different measures mean.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
    You claimed "EU chicken cause food borne illness" and now say "most of that happens after consumers buy it". You can't claim that EU chicken is worse than US chicken and then say that it's actually the consumers cooking habits, as it basically negates the comparison of health standards. Unless you are saying that Americans don't know jack about cooking food and constantly give themselves food poisoning at an alarming rate despite having allegedly safer food standards.
    They do not measure the same thing, jackass. One measures safety of only chicken, while the other measures total food borne illness of all foods AFTER purchase. these are not remotely the same things and it would take a colossal idiot not to understand that fact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    commented on 's reply
    No, you are wrong. Treating chicken with chlorine actually does disinfect it better and results in less bacteria contamination without any health effects what so ever. Thus why the EU does it with vegetables. So why did the EU suddenly change its laws to ban chlorine treated chicken in 2008? Simple, protectionism and no other reason. It is a bureaucratic means to block fair and legal competition and that is their ONLY motivation. FACT.

    It costs less due to being more efficient, it is just as healthy, and it tastes identical. The EU, as usual, is just unable to compete and is resorting to protectionism without even the slightest scientific justification. In fact, their chicken products are less safe, result in more illness, yet the EU forces it simply as a protectionist prevent free, fair, and open completion. I will happily cheer the day the EU protectionist pigs are drug out into the street and shot like the common man harming authoritarian pieces of **** that they are.

  • Dauphin
    replied
    You know I am not Australian? Right?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    Look at the clowns. be that dinner or the austalian guy.
    means nothing

    in theory
    Greece is everything

    in power
    russia kills everything

    the truth is hiden in that icon

    we have to find it

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    Orthodoxy is everything

    all else, is fillings

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    Russia of course can theaten everyone with christianity and human rights
    Sorry Russia we are just the foundeation of everything

    We need your christian rjussian justice nukes though

    Look at the world

    Lost

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    *Follow us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/nrgnewrockgenerator*https://www.amazon.com/Which-Side-Are-You-On/dp/B004RR7YRY*Copyright Disclaimer Under Se...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    Although really, US.UK **** you. You mean nothing

    Beglium adn Europe I'm sorry I will be a stranger
    Has something to do with life

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    When it comes to food there never was a US/UK.
    That's for immigrants

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    I'd also say, I wouldn't object to a free trade agreement for the UK that allowed US chlorinated chicken in. It would have to be labelled under country of origin rules though - to separate out for any UK exports to the EU (any goods using US chicken would not be permissible for re-export), and potentially to highlight different methods in place compared to UK producers (a political concession to those who don't want to buy it). UK producers won't lower/change standards if they want to retain the EU market.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bereta_Eder
    replied
    Listen, I like dinner in the fact that like me he is for freedom fo speech. But when it comes to chicken **** USA **** Britain fuch flemish belgium fascists
    Greek is best

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Can you provide any stats that show American chicken causes less illness than EU chicken? All I have seen is your assertion with no support.

    I am open-minded, it's just that I have only ever seen data to the contrary.

    THe UK has had a lot of problems in the past (BSE, Salmonella in eggs, etc), and events like that caused substantial improvements in the food safety standards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    You claimed "EU chicken cause food borne illness" and now say "most of that happens after consumers buy it". You can't claim that EU chicken is worse than US chicken and then say that it's actually the consumers cooking habits, as it basically negates the comparison of health standards. Unless you are saying that Americans don't know jack about cooking food and constantly give themselves food poisoning at an alarming rate despite having allegedly safer food standards.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X