Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brexit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Uncle Sparky
    commented on 's reply
    What's the matter... you chicken?

  • BeBro
    replied
    Also, this will likely prevent them chickens from launching organized revenge-eatings of humans.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aeson
    replied
    If you really care about not getting sick from eating chickens ... or taking good care of chickens ... don't eat chickens. Problem solved!

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBro
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post
    And also allowed it up until 2008 on chicken just like in the US but as soon as the Great Recession hit and EU producers were struggling to compete against superior, safer, and cheaper US chicken... Well, only then did they invent an excuse for their obvious anti-consumer protectionism.
    Do you plan to backup your claims about food quality/chicken/eggs/whatever in the US and/or the EU in the near future? That would be something new

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    If they want to protect their chickens that's their business.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    I love these dumb arguments. “Chlorine doesn’t work as a disinfectant!” Which is why the EU allows it to be used as a disinfectant on literally thousands upon thousands of different types of food stuff, right? And also allowed it up until 2008 on chicken just like in the US but as soon as the Great Recession hit and EU producers were struggling to compete against superior, safer, and cheaper US chicken... Well, only then did they invent an excuse for their obvious anti-consumer protectionism.

    Tell me another one, Joker.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBro
    replied
    Vikings only went to America because of the food! It's fact because I said so, and I agree. Anybody disagreeing has no idea what he's talking about.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Clipboard01.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	106.0 KB
ID:	9387598

    https://satwcomic.com/it-s-genetic

    Leave a comment:


  • BlackCat
    replied
    It's truly amazing how consistent Oerdin is in his failueres

    Oerdins failure 1
    Oerdins failure 2
    Oerdins failure 3

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by Dinner View Post

    They do not measure the same thing, jackass. One measures safety of only chicken, while the other measures total food borne illness of all foods AFTER purchase. these are not remotely the same things and it would take a colossal idiot not to understand that fact.
    Got it - you are saying that the US is **** at handling food, and you have no desire to show any statistics to support your BAM approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    So if it's not the chicken, then it's the lettuce with e. coli, either way the US looks bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    My family went shopping today in high tax California and got extra large AAA+++ eggs for $0.69 per dozen and boneless chicken leg meat for $0.74 per pound, pre-marinated (I probably could have gotten cheaper if I really looked), boneless breast meat was $0.89 per pound. This is in the highest cost state in the nation. It is cheaper, it is safer, it is just better in every way possible. The EU is simply afraid of free, fair, and open market based competition thus their utterly false complete lies they use to justify their protectionism. To compare, in the US, you can buy the supposedly superior EU stand of chicken but virtually no one opts for it because it is worthless **** sold only to stupid people of low intelligence who pay many times more for the same product. Notice how the EU doesn't allow free, fair and open market based competition?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Me: Chicken is safer when it is treated with chlorine and their is absolutely no scientificially based negative effects.

    Stupid person: Total food borne illnesses are higher in the US (including not just chicken but EVERY SINGLE ****ING LAST ONE of every food product) when we include post purchase handling of all food products.

    Me: Those are not remotely the same and you are an idiot trying to avoid my original fact based claim.

    Stupid person: Durrrrrrr!

    Me: Now, get your shoe shine box, boy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
    You know I am not Australian? Right?
    That does not matter. You're "evidenc" is garbage, it doesn't remotely measure the same thing, so your claim can and should be rejected out of hand. Hell, even The Economist said it was inconsequential nonsense from stupid people who do not understand that the different measures mean.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dinner
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
    You claimed "EU chicken cause food borne illness" and now say "most of that happens after consumers buy it". You can't claim that EU chicken is worse than US chicken and then say that it's actually the consumers cooking habits, as it basically negates the comparison of health standards. Unless you are saying that Americans don't know jack about cooking food and constantly give themselves food poisoning at an alarming rate despite having allegedly safer food standards.
    They do not measure the same thing, jackass. One measures safety of only chicken, while the other measures total food borne illness of all foods AFTER purchase. these are not remotely the same things and it would take a colossal idiot not to understand that fact.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X