Brett Kavanaugh is the Very Best Judge on the Supreme Court

[Kidlicious]

Ming: You admit that you don't know. You are ignoring facts.

[Kidlicious]

And there is no record of anyone asking them to investigate it. Unlike this instance.

So what?

[rah]

I'm more likely to believe nothing happened if no one claims anything happened. DUH

Don't you believe if someone claims something happened that it should be investigated before you make a claim of whether you believe anything did or did not happen?

[Kidlicious]

Ffs Do you have to double down on stupid every single time? The question isn't whether or not he was accused.

[rah]

Psss, I was responding to your comment. Don't you ever read first.

I don't know that they don't have evidence of you raping 15 year old girls either.

[Kidlicious]

So you admit that people not being interviewed doesn't matter, regarding Kav?

I can't fathom how this is your take on what I posted.

In plain english. If no one claims a wrongdoing, there is no need to investigate.
If someone does claim there was a wrongdoing, without an investigation, any claim of believing or not believing don't hold water and are just opinion and shouldn't be expressed as fact. But collaborating witnesses might help one form an opinion.

The FBI did not fully investigate the allegations so any belief on the matter is probably idle speculation. But the lack of an investigation does not qualify as proof of innocence.

wow how was I allowed to edit that, I'm not a mod anymore freaky. My apologies.

edit: rah meant this to be his post.

[Ming]

Typical Kidiot... uttering nonsense lines when he has no answers... trying to change the discussion when he's wrong... making up what others say so as to distract from his own stupid posts...
Nothing changes with Kidiot... just more of the same.

[Kidlicious]

What am I wrong about

[Berzerker]

Lawyers for Ford and Ramirez, however, sent letters to Wray that, together, named more than 50 individuals that the bureau’s agents should interview. Only nine were ever contacted — all of them from the list that the Republicans had submitted.

Ah, the search for truth from a list compiled by the Republicans

Kelly and Pogrebin said that Kavanaugh said he would talk to the reporters to provide them with background information as long as they falsely noted in the book that he declined to be interviewed.

Sounds suspicious, he agreed to be interviewed but asked 'the enemy' to claim in the book that he declined to be interviewed? Or did Kavanaugh consider providing background information as different from being interviewed? I dont think he was asking them to lie.

[Kidlicious]

No one is prevented from sharing what they know with the media. The media doesn't have to share their story though, as we know from experience.

[rah]

My apologies Kid. I was trying to quote one of your posts and instead I edited it. I shouldn't have privileges to do that.
Please feel free to edit it back. I don't know the whole post so I don't want to do it.

Again, truly apologize. Not something I would do.

[Kidlicious]

My apologies Kid. I was trying to quote one of your posts and instead I edited it. I shouldn't have privileges to do that.
Please feel free to edit it back. I don't know the whole post so I don't want to do it.

Again, truly apologize. Not something I would do.

Np, but which post?

[Kidlicious]

Ok. Np

[Kidlicious]

I can't fathom how this is your take on what I posted.

In plain english. If no one claims a wrongdoing, there is no need to investigate.
If someone does claim there was a wrongdoing, without an investigation, any claim of believing or not believing don't hold water and are just opinion and shouldn't be expressed as fact. But collaborating witnesses might help one form an opinion.

The FBI did not fully investigate the allegations so any belief on the matter is probably idle speculation. But the lack of an investigation does not qualify as proof of innocence.

wow how was I allowed to edit that, I'm not a mod anymore freaky. My apologies.

edit: rah meant this to be his post.

He doesn't need to prove his innocence. Also the FBI doesn't necessarily need to interview everyone, although they probably need to explain in this case.

[rah]

Yes, I think the main complaint was that it wasn't much of an investigation. Was the lack of it politically motivated? As much as you've given the FBI crap for acting against Republican interests, here's a case where it seems to have benefited them. So maybe they're not as biased as you like to claim. So yeah, an explanation would help.