Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Escalation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Berzerker
    replied
    Originally posted by Aeson View Post
    If they were there "with Antifa" then they aren't "fine people". There's a difference between participating in a rally, and counterprotesting the rally though.

    Showing up to counterprotest the Unite the Right rally doesn't mean you are there "with Antifa", even if Antifa shows up too. That's because your counterprotest location was determined by Unite the Right rally. Everyone who wants to counterprotest it has to be there at that specific time.

    If you are there to participate in the Unite the Right rally, which was organized by Jason Kessler (the guy too racist for the Proud Boys or Richard Spencer), then you are "with" Neo Nazis and White Supremacists. Those who didn't want to associate with the Neo Nazis and White Supremacists could have held their own rally at a different time and/or location. But they chose to be there with the Nazis and White Supremacists, lending moral support to them. So they aren't "fine people".

    If Antifa were to hold a Unite the Left rally where they plan to pay homage to Stalin's Holodomor ... then yes, anyone who shows up to join that rally is a terrible person. Anyone who showed up to counterprotest it could have been a "fine person" even if the some White Nationalists showed up to counterprotest too. Same can be said of anyone who wanted to march along with Black Lives Matter chanting "Pigs in a blanket, fry them like bacon".
    Did you read the list of participants submitted to the police for the permit? I did, the majority of protesters were not neo-Nazis. They were various groups with their own causes protesting what they perceive to be a politically correct effort to remove history from the public square. If they shared the neo-Nazi's ideology they would have attended their night time tiki torch march. It doesn't matter who organized the 'unite the right' protest, he doesn't speak for all the other people who showed up to defend a statue.

    In the very same press conference Trump clearly condemned the neo-Nazis and white supremacists, but the media conveniently ignores what he said about them because it conflicts with their lie that he called neo-Nazis fine people. So guess what clip the media runs with - they show the night time tiki torch march alongside Trump's 'fine people on both sides' comment about the day time protest turned brawl. Who was the other side during the tiki torch march? Antifa didn't show up to protest them, there was no other side. The guilt by association you're employing for your double standard was used against people during the red scare of the McCarthy era.
    Last edited by Berzerker; August 7, 2019, 19:59.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    So you are against free speech, and in favor of dark money. Nice. Julian Castro did not call anyone a white supremacist. And all individual donations of $200 or more to political campaigns are a matter of public record. BY LAW. Castro only called out the max donors, and my guess is that they are pretty proud to support their Dear Leader and don't feel shamed -- considering their large donations.

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    None of that is even remotely true.

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    Pretty sure you still haven't read it.

  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
    Ok so I read it JR. Happy? This comes right after the shooting. He is blaming Hispanics in San Antonio for the murder of those people buy talking about Trump calling illegal immigrants people that are "invading" the country. The shooter used the word "invade." So he was shaming those Hispanics for supporting the murder of Hispanics. And you wanted me to read the tweet!
    I just knew you hadn't read it. But even now that you *claim* you have, you make me doubt your word by totally mischaracterizing its content. Castro is blaming TRUMP DONORS for funding Trump's ongoing campaign to label immigrants as "invaders." He makes ZERO reference to the shooting. But that's not what your media masters told you to believe, so you just keep repeating their garbage interpretation.

    Fun fact that makes me think you just lied about reading the original Castro tweet: There are very few Latin-sounding names - most would say NONE - on the list of 44 Maximum Trump Donor San Antonians:
    Click image for larger version  Name:	SanAntonio.png Views:	1 Size:	366.0 KB ID:	9378015


    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Another journo on MSNBC suggested that Trump planned this whole thing so that the Flag will be raised to full staff on 8-8, which is a number significant to white nationalists.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Ok so I read it JR. Happy? This comes right after the shooting. He is blaming Hispanics in San Antonio for the murder of those people buy talking about Trump calling illegal immigrants people that are "invading" the country. The shooter used the word "invade." So he was shaming those Hispanics for supporting the murder of Hispanics. And you wanted me to read the tweet!

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    commented on 's reply
    You don't call people White Supremacist! You don't name and shame people!

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    You won't even read Julian Castro's tweet? The one you claim to be so upset about?
    Why don't you just post a list of your fave websites and forums? It will cut out the middleman (you), since all you do is post whatever they tell you.

  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Castro outed one of his own donors, proven by records.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    commented on 's reply
    Look man, there are your people out there that never heard that correction and believe that ****. Do you have any ****ing shame for defending scum like that!

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    No, it's not. One person said that. One. And, as I told you previously, she retracted and apologized.
    But of course, your alt-media friends didn't tell you about that, did they?

  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by giblets View Post
    Maybe people don't want to patronize businesses run by people who give money to a narcissistic pu$$y grabber
    Please keep up. The current accusation is that he has a plan to exterminate latinos.

    Leave a comment:


  • giblets
    replied
    Maybe people don't want to patronize businesses run by people who give money to a narcissistic pu$$y grabber

    Leave a comment:


  • rah
    replied
    Our Kidiot has never let things like facts stop a good rant. Silly you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X