Thread for obviously newsworthy stuff

[Kidlicious]

They also need some evidence.

[Giancarlo]

There are many Kkkidiots in Amerikkka... But there are many new voters too. So I have my hope. Or have we become kkkidiocracy?

[pchang]

So, it turns out that the statute of limitations for Federal Election laws is 5 years. Since the payouts happened in October of 2016, the Justice Dept. has until October of 2021 to indict Trump.

Since the Justice Dept. policy is that a sitting President cannot be indicted, Trump can skate this incident if he can get himself re-elected. If he is a 1 term President, he would be out of office on Jan. 21, 2021. This would give Justice 9 months to indict. So, now Trump REALLY REALLY needs to get re-elected. I wonder if there are enough Kidiots to save him.

[Giancarlo]

David Pecker, the owner of American Media Inc (which owns the national enquirer) just received immunity from federal prosecutors. Pecker is linked to Michael Cohen and of course Donald Trump himself. The criminal case is growing. I think Trumps business partners and friends are first. Then his family members will be next.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5...

So much for Hillarys emails, statues, and safe sex ed books.

So anyone wanna take bets on who gets prosecuted next? It will be like fantasy football.

[self biased]

You've got to be kidding me! They had a strong case with substantial evidence. They got guilty verdicts on eight charges and are likely to retry him for the other ten since there was just one hold out. And Manafort faces another trial in DC later next month. How the **** is this a hoax or for political purposes? He didn't pay his taxes and committed all sorts of other kinds of fraud. He is nothing more than a career criminal, like the fool in the oval office.

And rather it's Michael Cohen that should be even more concerning to you. He is cooperating with Mueller. His own attorney say that. Cohen also pointed the finger at Trump under oath in the committing of a felony. So your dear dingbat of a leader is now an unindicted (for now) co-conspirator.

BUT WHAT ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS?

[JohnT]

He's not kidding you. He's kidding himself. It's even in his name!

[Giancarlo]

The point isn't whether or not Manafort is guilty. It's what is the motivation behind this. Is it a hoax or not. That is, is all this for political purpose.

You've got to be kidding me! They had a strong case with substantial evidence. They got guilty verdicts on eight charges and are likely to retry him for the other ten since there was just one hold out. And Manafort faces another trial in DC later next month. How the **** is this a hoax or for political purposes? He didn't pay his taxes and committed all sorts of other kinds of fraud. He is nothing more than a career criminal, like the fool in the oval office.

And rather it's Michael Cohen that should be even more concerning to you. He is cooperating with Mueller. His own attorney say that. Cohen also pointed the finger at Trump under oath in the committing of a felony. So your dear dingbat of a leader is now an unindicted (for now) co-conspirator.

[rah]

I doubt that will even make a difference to the Kidiot. He will continue to scream how fake the charges were. What a douche.

[Proteus_MST]

Actually even a Trumpist Jury member on Fox said that she couldn't do anything else but vote for guilty in all 18 accounts, because the paper trail was so convincing.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...mpression=true

But to quote myself (with some additions) from a previous posting (that unfortunately was blocked some time due to the forums spam filter and now is on the previous page) regarding said Trumpist:

But of course
[Trump-Mode]
It may well be that she is a TINO/RINO who was paid by trhe Democrats and/or Mueller to vote pro guilty ... togetehr with all the other RINOs/TINOs in the jury
(except for the single upright american who was uncorruptible by the democrats money in at least half of the cases (and must have been tricked by he democrats and RINOs in the remaining 8 cases in order to vote yes))

[/Trump-Mode]

[rah]

Said the person that didn't hear any of the evidence in court and is just repeating what they're saying on fox. What a moron.

Kid version of truth.

[Kidlicious]

Naw, the point was that he was guilty as all hell.

Only if you got manure fer yer brains.

[JohnT]

Naw, the point was that he was guilty as all hell.

[Proteus_MST]

The point isn't whether or not Manafort is guilty. It's what is the motivation behind this. Is it a hoax or not. That is, is all this for political purpose.

Even a Trumpist voted pro "guilty" in all 18 cases:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/23/manafort-juror-reveals-lone-holdout-prevented-mueller-team-from-winning-conviction-on-all-counts.html?__twitter_impression=true

So it surely doesn't sound liek a Hoax


But of course
[Trump-Mode]
It may well be that she ois a TINO/RINO who was paid by trhe Democrats and/or Mueller to vote pro guilty ... togetehr with all the other RINOs/TINOs in the jury
(except for the single upright american who was uncorruptible by the democrats money in at least half of the cases)

[/Trump-Mode]

[Kidlicious]

The point isn't whether or not Manafort is guilty. It's what is the motivation behind this. Is it a hoax or not. That is, is all this for political purpose.

[Proteus_MST]

It has now been revealed that in all 10 cases where Manaford was subjected to mistrial, it was just a single jury member out of 12 who prevented that Manaford was found guilty

https://twitter.com/MarshallCohen/st...63982408425472

[Trump-Mode]
Now we have the proof that this all is a witch hunt by the democrats.
11 dirty jury members wbo were paid by the democrats and didn't care to let a poor innocent man burn.
And only one single upright american citizen who was, at least, able to save Manaford from the worst (i.e. being found guilty on all accounts)

[/Trump-Mode]