What a bunch of self righteous pussies

[notyoueither]

She cares enough about honesty? Is that what's she's doing while selling the American worker down the river out of both sides of her mouth telling the people who elect her she's against free trade while telling bankers who pay her that she's for it?

The reason she lost is that enough of those who've been fuvcked by the American system turned out to say 'I'm with him!' And damn yeah, a lot of them were white women.

The establishment hasn't been working for lower income Americans lately. They've just told you so, rather loudly.

[notyoueither]

The sex thing actually bothers me much less than the rest of it, and I've said so. Jefferson was a rapist, and still a fine president. I was referring to, well, everything else. Trump appears to have no virtues at all. Like, I'm hard-pressed to think of anything morally admirable about him whatever. Hillary, sure: she works hard, it's possible to believe there's something she honestly cares about other than herself, she has self-control and resilience, she appears to think things through to a much greater extent than Trump does, and she at least cares enough about honesty to bother with making the lies even superficially believable. This is not high praise--she's a politician--but she does not give the appearance of being a failed human being in absolutely every respect. FWIW.

And the sex thing bugs me a whole hell of a lot more, actually...

Among all the women and feminists who are strongly for Hillary, just what the fuvck do they make of the accusation of enabler in chief?!

This is not some trivial matter. It was a number of women, and they've all faced some serious adversity in their lives over their experience with Bill's dick.

What the fuvck?! I thought this **** was supposed to, you know, actually matter? Not be brushed under some rug of '#we're with her'

If you're with her, you're with pond scum.

[Kidlicious]

The problem with this argument is that (a) we're not in the middle of a national emergency, (b) what FDR did was terrible, even if that was a national emergency, and (c) yes, I'm aware that FDR was a Democrat.

Actually yes we are. It's called the War on Terrorism. The enemy has not been defeated, and President Obama never even called attacks Islamic Terrorism when they occurred. It has been very disturbing to have a Commander in Chief that you don't trust to put National Security above liberal social justice.

[Kidlicious]

The sex thing actually bothers me much less than the rest of it, and I've said so. Jefferson was a rapist, and still a fine president. I was referring to, well, everything else. Trump appears to have no virtues at all. Like, I'm hard-pressed to think of anything morally admirable about him whatever. Hillary, sure: she works hard, it's possible to believe there's something she honestly cares about other than herself, she has self-control and resilience, she appears to think things through to a much greater extent than Trump does, and she at least cares enough about honesty to bother with making the lies even superficially believable. This is not high praise--she's a politician--but she does not give the appearance of being a failed human being in absolutely every respect. FWIW.

Trump is a fighter. Anyone else would have gave up the fight. That's actually a very good quality to have in a leader. You are going to find that people are going to follow him.

[kentonio]

Actually yes we are. It's called the War on Terrorism. The enemy has not been defeated, and President Obama never even called attacks Islamic Terrorism when they occurred. It has been very disturbing to have a Commander in Chief that you don't trust to put National Security above liberal social justice.

Ooohh, the War on Terrorism (tm). Funny isn't it how when you declare a war on something as vaguely defined as that, no-one is really sure what the target is supposed to be. There has always been terrorism just like there have always been drugs. When are these wars supposed to end exactly and where are its limits? If the US decided it needed to incarcerate its entire Muslim population would that be acceptable? How about carpet bombing the middle east? If a US president stands on an aircraft carrier in front of a huge flag and declares 'Mission Accomplished' does that mean its over, despite terrorist acts inevitably continuing? What about when the US militias blow things us, is that part of this war, or is that ok because its American?

So many questions..

[giblets]

Like the war on poverty except they mean "war" literally

[Aeson]

I vote we invade Terrorism!

[Kidlicious]

Ooohh, the War on Terrorism (tm). Funny isn't it how when you declare a war on something as vaguely defined as that, no-one is really sure what the target is supposed to be. There has always been terrorism just like there have always been drugs. When are these wars supposed to end exactly and where are its limits? If the US decided it needed to incarcerate its entire Muslim population would that be acceptable? How about carpet bombing the middle east? If a US president stands on an aircraft carrier in front of a huge flag and declares 'Mission Accomplished' does that mean its over, despite terrorist acts inevitably continuing? What about when the US militias blow things us, is that part of this war, or is that ok because its American?

So many questions..

So many words to read, yet such a waste of time.

[Kidlicious]

The next time you think about saying national security is racist just stick a lemon in your mouth.

[giblets]

It took you 4 hours to think of that?

[Kidlicious]

It took you 4 hours to think of that?

Nope. Busy.

[Dinner]

No, I mean women who voted for someone who called Mexicans rapists and was endorsed by the KKK.

Stop lying. He said some of the illegals coming from Mexico which is factually true. No one said all Mexicans are rapists.

He said enough objectionable things that you should be able to stick to the things he actually said without lying and making new ones up.

[Berzerker]

Actually yes we are. It's called the War on Terrorism. The enemy has not been defeated, and President Obama never even called attacks Islamic Terrorism when they occurred. It has been very disturbing to have a Commander in Chief that you don't trust to put National Security above liberal social justice.

Republicans have been harping about this for years, Obama wont call it Islamic terrorism waa waa waa... Since when is Obama or anybody else obliged to repeat stupid GOP slogans or labels? Attaching the terrorists to a broader religion practiced by a billion people helps recruitment, the fact Republicans cant figure this out explains their criminally incompetent conduct of foreign policy. They defend Bush's invasion of Iraq while the tears flow for the Benghazi 4 because that was Hillary's mistake. They're partisan hacks with the blood of millions on their hands.

Trump said the Bush crowd lied us into Iraq and he's gonna make Rudy Giuliani a bigshot in his cabinet?

[giblets]

Stop lying. He said some of the illegals coming from Mexico which is factually true. No one said all Mexicans are rapists.

He said enough objectionable things that you should be able to stick to the things he actually said without lying and making new ones up.

Dinner, racist ****bag, defends racist ****bag. Quelle surprise.

[giblets]

Republicans have been harping about this for years, Obama wont call it Islamic terrorism waa waa waa... Since when is Obama or anybody else obliged to repeat stupid GOP slogans or labels? Attaching the terrorists to a broader religion practiced by a billion people helps recruitment, the fact Republicans cant figure this out explains their criminally incompetent conduct of foreign policy. They defend Bush's invasion of Iraq while the tears flow for the Benghazi 4 because that was Hillary's mistake. They're partisan hacks with the blood of millions on their hands.

Trump said the Bush crowd lied us into Iraq and he's gonna make Rudy Giuliani a bigshot in his cabinet?

Get ready for 4 years of incompetent foreign policy