Originally posted by Dauphin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So, about Rio...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostWhen the wall fell mcdonalds started to set shop in poland.
there already was a local chain of traditional food there.
it was cheap affordable and relatively healthy.
mcdonalds set shop and lowered the price of their products below that of the local polish food chain.
mcdonalds in poland operated in a loss but they had the mothercompany filling in with money from abroad.
the local food chain couldn't stand the competition.
it closed down. people lost their jobs. people lost their local healthy food.
when this happened, mcdonalds raised the cost of their products higher than what the local food chains had.
yeah
free trade is badNo, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dauphin View PostIs your complaint against Free Trade, or predatory pricing practices?
Huge splat.For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View Postwhich is?
and is enforced by?
Assuming it's true, Poland could have placed restrictions on McD's and stopped the practice. That they didn't was their choice or they decided it wasn't happening.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostI know McDonalds is everywhere, and they're not the loss leader everywhere, or they'd go bankrupt in short order.
have you ever even left kansas?
They are retreating heavily in a vast number of countries years now, probably in poland too (because after all they sell ****)
I was talking about what happened there initially
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dauphin View PostOne is anti-competition and opposed by the WTO, the other is open competition.
Assuming it's true, Poland could have placed restrictions on McD's and stopped the practice. That they didn't was their choice or they decided it wasn't happening.
Don't know why they didn't do that. Maybe it happened too fast to notice or maybe they simply didn't know.
So to get this straight: you're saying that this degree of thievery is illegal? and the law that protects from free market debauchery is enforced by an agency?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostSo to get this straight: you're saying that this degree of thievery is illegal? and the law that protects from free market debauchery is enforced by an agency?
Enforced- by the local country if it chooses to
Challenged or disputed - at the WTO; but don't expect to win if it is blatantOne day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
Comment
-
to break this down
Originally posted by Dauphin View PostIllegal - if the country in which it is happening makes a law against it
Enforced- by the local country if it chooses to
Challenged or disputed - at the WTO; but don't expect to win if it is blatant
Comment
Comment