What is your thanks/thanked ratio?

[Egbert]

It does not mean crap. Even I have 1 thanks.

You now have two. I have thanked you for the quoted poast.

[Egbert]

The thanks were added well before I had any say into it. Ive left it because Im worried what would happen to Braindead if thanks were to be done away with.

My thanks/thanked ratio is too much:not enough

Thank you Aeson.

I always have regarded you as a most thoughtful and considerate chap.

[loinburger]

I've been doing a lot of thinking lately on the subject of ballbusting, and I would like to know what everyone's thoughts on the subject are. Have any guys here been kicked, punched, kneed or otherwise hit in the nuts by a girl? And have any girls here ever kicked, punched, kneed, or otherwise hit a guy in the nuts before? Do any girls here enjoy kicking/hitting guys in the balls? And do any guys here enjoy getting kicked/hit in the balls? Please share your thoughts on the subject here.

[loinburger]

I've provided the context on this one

Given the amount of corporate welfare that CEOs and their companies receive from the government, why don't we make CEOs pee in a cup, to test them for any illicit/illegal drug use?

Then, if they are found to be using drugs, we can kick them off of whatever corporate welfare benefits they receive.

I favor this, as long as they all piss on your face and you drown in it.

[Sava]

I have more thanks received than given because I produce excellent content

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

[Kidlicious]

I have more thanks received than given because I produce excellent content

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

You also have almost an exact ratio of 1, meaning that you aren't likely to thank others unless they thank you.

[Ming]

You also have almost an exact ratio of 1, meaning that you aren't likely to thank others unless they thank you.

Yet another classic example of Kid's ability to come to the wrong conclusion when using stats.

[Kidlicious]

Yet another classic example of Kid's ability to come to the wrong conclusion when using stats.

And what is Ming's conclusion?

[Ming]

I didn't make one... because I don't think the ratio can be used to prove anything... as I implied in an earlier post.
You and a few others are the ones that like to make **** up... and use stats incorrectly in lame attempts to prove your point.

[Kidlicious]

I didn't make one... because I don't think the ratio can be used to prove anything... as I implied in an earlier post.
You and a few others are the ones that like to make **** up... and use stats incorrectly in lame attempts to prove your point.

Do you know what 'more likely' means. I'm not trying to prove anything.

[Ming]

Back peddle all you want... Anybody looking at this thread can make their own opinion.
Have a nice day.

[DaShi]

Beaten to it.

[Kidlicious]

I've been forward peddling the whole time. Nice story though.

[Egbert]

I have more thanks received than given because I produce excellent content

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

This is one of the funniest poasts I have seen on the OT.

[NICE MOBIUS]

More simple-minded crap from Kid, I see

Surely what's more important is your thanks to posts ratio!?

Take our illustrious friend, Kid, with a thanks to posts of: 103/27,542

That's a pathetic 0.38% thanks to posts ratio. Or in other words, confirming what we've always known, that your many thousands of posts are utter and complete bull****!

I, OTOH, have almost as many thanks as you (78), from only 672 posts - for an 11.6% thanks to posts ratio...

Therefore my posts are more than 30x more thankworthy than yours...