And then what your fixating on on me and homosexual relations means hmm?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Gay couples will have the right to adopt priests
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostI can site sources, but I don't know how reliable they are. No one really cares about people exaggerating the dangers of smoking, and no PC organization is going to publish accurate statistics and the health risks of sodomy. But it is reported that smoking decreases your life expectancy by 2 to 10 years, and sodomy reduces your life expectancy by 8 to 20 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostYou're stupid, you aren't stopping what you say you want to stop, you're just labelling it somewhat differently to try to pretend it doesn't exist.
Originally posted by Aeson View PostIf a guy (or girl) can attract more than one mate, kudos to them. I don't have a problem with polyamorous relationships so long as they are consensual.
"Harems" as they have been throughout history and in places they actually are called "harems" were always a form of enslavement. You're a sick **** to think that that "makes sense".
And about "harems", it's just boring to write polygamous whatever because i need to look for that word in a dictionary. Now, harem is a well-known word for any anime fanKnowledge is Power
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostEasy solution to HIV via unprotected anal sex: condoms and being careful about who your partners are. It's not a risk innate to homosexuality. (It's even a risk for heterosexual couples.)I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Aeson View PostIt means it's funny that you're a homophobe who watches gay porn and fixates on dicks in hetero porn.Knowledge is Power
Comment
-
And what's with the term "gay propaganda".
Why not "christian propaganda" Why is it OK for parents and society to subject their children to christian propaganda and not gay propaganda. They are both lifestyles.
One might even argue that it's worse to indoctrinate children to the fantasy of religion then to simply inform them about different lifestyles.
When you come down to it, Christians have killed more people in the name of religion than gays have.
So which is worse. Poisoning the minds of little children with the fantasy of some supreme being or telling them about alternative lifestyles?
The use of the term gay "propaganda" is simply wrong. It's like you are trying to equate it to nazi "propaganda".
It's simply education and learning, not propaganda.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ellestar View PostBut as far as i know humans don't have instinctive protection from homosexual relationships, like we have it for incest (Westermarck effect). So i don't see where exactly a "huge difference" will come from if children will be taught or given examples that it's ok. It's true that Westermarck effect only prevents a sexual attraction (so a forming of a relation), but most people have a friendship relation. So what exactly will stop teenagers from converting a "friends" relation to a "friends with benefits" relation with the friends of the same gender, if they'll be taught and shown examples that it's ok?
In any case, your claim doesn't address practical examples of a much more widespread homosexual relations in certain cultures where it's considered ok.
Biologically speaking, you would expect most people to have a preference for members of the opposite sex, since people with such a preference are likely to have more success with passing on their genes. The development of the brain is affected by hormones before birth, so that males are usually biased in favor of being attracted to females, and females are usually biased in favor of being attracted to males. In any environment where people are not pressured to be heterosexual and not pressured to be homosexual, you can expect most people to be heterosexual.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostAnd what's with the term "gay propaganda".
Why not "christian propaganda" Why is it OK for parents and society to subject their children to christian propaganda and not gay propaganda. They are both lifestyles.
One might even argue that it's worse to indoctrinate children to the fantasy of religion then to simply inform them about different lifestyles.
When you come down to it, Christians have killed more people in the name of religion than gays have.
So which is worse. Poisoning the minds of little children with the fantasy of some supreme being or telling them about alternative lifestyles?
The use of the term gay "propaganda" is simply wrong. It's like you are trying to equate it to nazi "propaganda".
It's simply education and learning, not propaganda.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostEducation isn't political. Your assertion is absurd.
Why is one "political" and the other not. What strange definition are you using for Political?Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostAre you actually claiming the being the recipient of anal sex is not more hazardous than smoking a cigarette? Just one time and you can get a tissue tear, which can result in an infection. And that has nothing to do with HIV.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ming View PostHuh... you are the one being absurd. Why is a discussion of gay life style any different than Christian or other religion propaganda?
Why is one "political" and the other not. What strange definition are you using for Political?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostAre you actually claiming the being the recipient of anal sex is not more hazardous than smoking a cigarette? Just one time and you can get a tissue tear, which can result in an infection.
You are ignoring that heterosexuals can also have anal sex, that vaginal sex has many of the same issues, and that most health issues involving sex of either type can be largely avoided through proper use of condoms.
And that has nothing to do with HIV.
Comment
Comment