Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghanistan: US Airstrike Hits Kunduz Hospital

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by rah View Post
    Thanks. I think I'll keep her then.
    But I thought you're the one that needs one. Have a pleasant afternoon.
    If I needed a wife I would have one and I would tell single men that they need one you idiot.
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment


    • Ah, now I see. You tell single men that they don't need a wife since they can have you.

      Thanks for the entertaining afternoon.
      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • Well I didn't tell anyone that they don't need a wife you poor old delusional bastard.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment


        • I just can't take all the hate on old people. I guess I should just go with the floe.
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • Couldn't you gents just duel with walking frames or something?

            Comment


            • This is the internet. Walkers would require actual physical activity.
              It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Proteus_MST View Post
                So, why not carpet bombing Kunduz (at the time when the Taliban still were there)?

                According to this US interpretation it would have been perfectly legal, due to the presence of enemies in the city
                No, I've made that clear in past posts in the discussion. It's only legal to target the actually enemy, and only when they are in the process of engaging friendlies. The person in charge on the ground is then able to make a decision if he needs support.
                "Yay Apoc!!!!!!!" - bipolarbear
                "At least there were some thoughts went into Apocalypse." - Urban Ranger
                "Apocalype was a great game." - DrSpike
                "In Apoc, I had one soldier who lasted through the entire game... was pretty cool. I like apoc for that reason, the soldiers are a bit more 'personal'." - General Ludd

                Comment


                • so is this a Rah slap fight.

                  show some dignity please.

                  Comment


                  • The irony is that bigoted idiots like rah think rah is a bigot, and they're right.

                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rah View Post
                      This is the internet. Walkers would require actual physical activity.
                      Walkers, as in the zombies from The Walking Dead?
                      A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                      Comment


                      • This thread should highlight how deadly precise USA weapons are.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Apocalypse View Post
                          Except it only matters if you are planning on taking out the hospital as a preemptive measure.
                          Just noticed Mobius didn't provide the full quote..

                          Originally posted by Army General John Campbell
                          To be clear, the decision to provide aerial fires was a U.S. decision made within the U.S. chain of command. A hospital was mistakenly struck. We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility.
                          So much for 'unless we decided it was self defense'. Great to see the US still respects Geneva and is taking this extremely seriously.

                          Campbell said on Tuesday he had directed forces under his command to undergo training to review operational authorities and rules of engagement to prevent further incidents like Kunduz.

                          Comment


                          • The part about it being unintentional just ... you don't read that part?
                            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Count Vlad View Post
                              This thread should highlight how deadly precise USA weapons are.
                              precision bonus: +100% damage vs Hospitals
                              Knowledge is Power

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
                                The part about it being unintentional just ... you don't read that part?
                                What do you mean? They've said it was unintentional and that they're going to introduce new training to try and avoid any repeat. It'll be good to hear the results of the investigation to see how it was allowed to continue after initial warnings from the doctors, but it shows the military are taking it seriously and looking to avoid any future repeat. Fair play to them.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X