Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Jesus ever have unintentional boners and wet drems etc., or were his genitals pretty much non-functional?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Jon Miller View Post
    Jesus is closer and more important to Christians than their mother or father.
    That is ****ed.

    Any God worth loving would put himself last, not first.
    To us, it is the BEAST.

    Comment


    • #77
      And any decent moral person would put other humans before a belief system with zero evidence supporting it

      ****ed.

      Just.****ed
      To us, it is the BEAST.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Alexander's Horse View Post
        From what I see in statuary Jesus is usually portrayed as not having genitals at all, rather like Barbie's Ken. Does that answer your questions?

        It's certainly on about the same level of reasoning.
        I've never seen a naked Jesus statue - he's always at least got a loincloth type thing on
        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

        Comment


        • #79
          heh see what's happening here?

          it takes only one very much disliked person by the majority of the forum (I won't say who) to create a fierce backlash against a person of a rumored divine provenance.

          and the attacks don't happen of course primarily against that person but against the other person who is disliked.

          If one can't grasp the surrounding evolution the thing he prophesizes gets attached to his own being disliked by others and this happens.

          even elok, who is true to even the most IMO nefarious reactionary aspects of a certain religion does not succumb to this tragedy.


          live and learn


          imagine christ being despised by everyone and then getting in a bar and start saying love one another. they'd throw bottles at him.

          Comment


          • #80
            Elok is BK-lite
            To us, it is the BEAST.

            Comment


            • #81
              Maybe the problem is that we need [Civil] threads. Instead, let's assume all threads are [Civil] unless tagged with [Uncivil].
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                Maybe the problem is that we need [Civil] threads. Instead, let's assume all threads are [Civil] unless tagged with [Uncivil].
                Why burden non-pussies? We didn't start this!
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
                  Why burden non-pussies? We didn't start this!
                  Actually, you did start this. Enjoy the backlash!
                  <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                    Actually, you did start this. Enjoy the backlash!
                    This is ****ed! You want me to tag my threads uncivil because of your intolerance?!
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                      Maybe the problem is that we need [Civil] threads. Instead, let's assume all threads are [Civil] unless tagged with [Uncivil].
                      Or just ban Sava until he calms down.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
                        This is ****ed! You want me to tag my threads uncivil because of your intolerance?!
                        Or you could, I dunno, stop posting almost nothing but insults.
                        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                          Or you could, I dunno, stop posting almost nothing but insults.
                          That's not the issue. This is YOUR problem. YOU get the burden.
                          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            No, the issue is whether your behavior is acceptable (and to be clear, you're certainly not the only one guilty of making this a toxic environment - however you best exemplify this behavior seeing as how you're the only one who's proud of it). If Aeson decides that your behavior is fine, then congratulations. If he decides that it's inappropriate, then you always have the option of finding a "better" forum (you might want to check out **** You And Die).

                            Previously when you were grudgingly refraining from making death threats you said that you did so because you respected the forum rules. This is just about changing the forum rules - I've stated my opinion that your behavior is unacceptable, you've stated your opinion that you have the right to do whatever the hell you want, now it's out of our hands.
                            <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Sava View Post
                              That is ****ed.

                              Any God worth loving would put himself last, not first.
                              Jesus is the light of the world and the trinity should come before all else. Jeez Sava, see the light brother!

                              Got anybody in your life that would die for your sins?

                              Dude...streets paved with gold and eternal happiness await your conversion.

                              Don't you know he already has gone to prepare your SavaCave in heaven?

                              I mean...c'mon man....Have you got a better offer?

                              "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                In Muslim heaven you supposedly get virgins (presumably willing virgins, otherwise that would be pretty ****ed) - I doubt that sex is allowed in Christian heaven since everybody will be sterile and you can't have sex except for procreation (although maybe you give birth to cherubs or something if you're in heaven, where by "cherub" I mean those cute flying babies, not the angels with four faces and four wings and cow feet etc).
                                <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X