Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'It's not about French fries, it's about freedom'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'It's not about French fries, it's about freedom'

    This is copycat thread Gold methinks

    Tldr:
    The top official in the Texas Department of Agriculture says yes, deep fat fryers should return to Texas school districts



    Detail:

    Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller, the cowboy-hat-wearing champion of local control, is looking to buck a decade-old statewide ban on deep fat fryers in public schools. Putting decision-making back into the hands of Texas school districts, he says, “isn't about french fries, it's about freedom.”

    Within the next couple of months, the Texas Department of Agriculture could be poised to repeal a state policy that bans deep fat fryers and soda machines on school campuses and places limits on the time and place that junk food can be sold there. In addition, Miller is proposing an increase in the number of allowed fundraiser days – when cupcakes and other sugary, fatty foods can be sold during the school day – from one to six per school year.

    His critics are calling foul, saying that Miller's actions are counterproductive in a state struggling to contain child obesity rates. But the commissioner believes that repealing these parts of the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy will simplify things, pulling the state into line with less-strict national standards. Currently, there are no federal restrictions on deep fat frying as a preparation method.

    “It’s simple. If a school district doesn’t agree with any of these changes, then they don’t have to implement them," Miller wrote in a statement, referring to the policy changes. "That’s the beauty here.”


    Miller hinted in January that deep fryers would be one of his priorities, and he officially proposed the change in March. A public comment period closed earlier this month, and Miller's nutrition team is now reviewing more than 200 comments. He is expected to announce this summer whether the commission will move forward with the changes.

    The deep fat fryer and soda machine ban are the last of strict nutritional policies introduced by former Agriculture Commissioner Susan Combs. In 2004, in addition to those bans, Combs introduced the more comprehensive Texas Public School Nutrition Policy, which banned foods with high levels of sugar and fats in public schools. The policy was repealed last year, when Todd Staples was commissioner, and Miller has consistently expressed his support for less regulation of food in schools.

    In January, Miller granted amnesty to cupcakes during his first act as commissioner in an attempt to reassure Texas parents that cupcakes and other treats would be allowed in schools under his administration, which he promised would increase local control of decision-making processes and protect the rights of parents.

    “This is coming from when he was on the campaign trail,” said Bryan Black, a spokesman for the Texas Department of Agriculture, referring to the proposed changes. "He heard it repeatedly, when it came to cupcakes and other things. People were asking why local communities shouldn't have a say."

    But for many parents and nutritionists, that reasoning doesn't square with reality. In 2013, 16 percent of high school students in Texas were obese, up from 14 percent in 2005. Only Arkansas, Kentucky and Alabama reported higher rates. Nationwide, child obesity rates have jumped from 7 percent in 1980 to 18 percent in 2012. Among minorities, the rates for children and adolescents were significantly higher, with Hispanics at 22 percent and non-Hispanic black youth at 20 percent.

    “I don't think there is any way he could have studied the issue or he never would have done this,” said Combs, who said it was “unimaginable” that Miller would go ahead with these repeals. “I am actually baffled and sorry that Commissioner Miller did what was not good for kids. If you give children bad choices, they will make them.”

    The Partnership for a Healthy Texas, a statewide coalition of more than 50 organizations working to prevent obesity, filed an open letter in opposition to the proposed changes. In the letter, the group challenged the merits of local control in questions of childhood nutrition.

    "Schools are one of the key environments where our state can work to defeat child obesity," the organization wrote. "Fit, nourished children perform better, miss less school, have fewer behavioral challenges, and are more likely to grow up to be healthy, working adults."

    Jay Root and Patrick Svitek contributed to this story.

    Disclosure: The Partnership for a Healthy Texas was a corporate sponsor of The Texas Tribune in 2013. A complete list of Tribune donors and sponsors can be viewed here.(http://www.texastribune.org/support-...s-and-members/)

    Source:
    Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller is looking to buck a decade-old statewide ban on deep fat fryers in public schools, putting decision-making about food in schools back in the hands of Texas school districts.
    Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!

  • #2
    Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller is clearly in the pocket of Big Trans Fat.
    Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
    RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

    Comment


    • #3
      Texas should fine parents with fat children. Puerto Rico's doing it.
      Puerto Rico law would brand parents of obese children 'child abusers'

      The controversial bill would allow the government to ‘educate’ families of obese children and levy increasingly heavy fines against those who fail to lose weight. Many are outraged: ‘I could lose my daughter because I feed her? It’s ridiculous’

      Nikhol Cruz Cepeda doesn’t look like a victim of child abuse. She has a wide, sparkling smile, enjoys spending time with her family and close circle of friends, and is doing well at school. Like any young teenager, she is a little shy when you first start talking to her, but she warms up quickly and is soon chatting happily about maybe working in science when she completes her studies.

      Her mother, Wandalee, is a devoted single parent who works hard at her job in a busy Puerto Rico car rental agency, in order to send her 14-year-old to one of the island’s best private schools. She says she has no bigger priority than steering her daughter towards adulthood in a happy, healthy and safe environment.

      Yet under a controversial new law that might soon be adopted by the Puerto Rico government, Nikhol’s mother could be branded a child abuser, with social workers and officials from the US territory’s department of education combing through the family’s affairs.

      The reason is that Nikhol, at 206lb, is considered to be obese. And under the terms of the proposed legislation, which many experts say is unfair and unenforceable, her mother could be fined up to $800 if Nikhol fails to lose weight.

      “I could lose my daughter because I feed her?” Wandalee said. “It’s ridiculous. It’s the culture in Puerto Rico. You see a skinny baby and people will say it needs feeding up. Is that really child abuse?”

      What many families see as a cultural issue, others consider a national health crisis, supported by statistics from recent studies that show rates of childhood obesity on the island running anywhere from 24% to 30%. That compares to an average of 17% across the US, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

      Such figures prompted Senator Gilbert Rodriguez Valle, one of Puerto Rico’s youngest and most popular politicians, to introduce the contentious bill which seeks to create a “healthy child programme”. If the bill became law, obese children would be identified in schools, and their families “educated” about the health risks and consequences of remaining overweight.

      If social workers believed there had been no progress after six months, they would have the authority to open a child neglect case and impose a fine of $500; if after a year they believed things were the same, another fine of $800 could be levied.

      Critics say the government is encroaching on territory it has no right to occupy.

      “The good thing is that he [Valle] is identifying the problem and trying to do something about it; the wrong thing is how he’s doing it,” Dr Ricardo Fontanet, president of the Puerto Rico chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, told the Guardian at his practice in San Juan.

      “First, he’s saying that if you have an obese child in the house, it’s synonymous with child abuse, and that’s completely wrong. You have to lose weight, sure, but to have the state coming to your home, looking at how you do things and charging you with child abuse is dangerous.

      “Second, they’re not involving pediatricians, nutritionists, dieticians, the people who prepare the lunches in schools, in any of this. Teachers aren’t trained to identify obese children; they don’t have the time, the facilities or the knowledge. They’re asking people with no knowledge of dealing with obesity to identify these patients.”

      Other experts say the bill takes a “simplistic view” of the factors that cause a person to be overweight.

      “Obesity is a disease, not a choice made by parents or their children,” said Dr Nikhil Dhurandhar, president of the Maryland-based Obesity Society. “Many known and unknown biological factors, in addition to personal nutrition and physical activity decisions, may interfere with weight loss, reinforcing the fact that we can’t treat obesity solely by placing the blame on parents or individuals.”

      Dhurandhar said lawmakers in Puerto Rico should ask themselves if they would impose fines against parents whose children had diabetes, asthma or cancer.

      Both doctors say an incentive-led programme would provide better motivation for children to lose weight than punishments for their parents – starting with improvements in diet and nutritional health.
      Fast food and public debt crisis among root causes

      At the most recent count Puerto Rico, an island of roughly 3,500 sq miles, had more than 2,000 fast food restaurants. A study published by Caribbean Business in December claimed that 39% of the population, some 1.4 million residents, visited one at least twice a week.

      For many families, though, eating out is often the cheapest option. “Not everyone has the money to eat as healthily as they should,” said Nikhol’s mother. “Puerto Ricans have big families, on average two to five kids, and that’s a lot of food to buy and a lot of time to prepare it. It’s easier and quicker to go out.”

      Encouraging parents to get their children to exercise more is also a challenge, Dr Fontanet acknowledges. The Puerto Rico government is battling a $70bn public debt crisis, and little money is available for maintaining parks and open spaces. “You see high grass, parks unsuitable for walking or playing, or for soccer, baseball, whatever the children want to play,” he said.

      “And many of the state schools don’t offer PE classes or activities because they don’t have to. The middle class tries to get their children into private schools, but most families can’t afford that. Poverty here is almost twice that of the US.”

      Data from the 2010 census showed 56% of Puerto Rican children lived in poverty but more recent figures, notably a study last year by the Annie E Casey Foundation, suggested that up to 83% lived in a “high poverty area”.

      Ramfis Negron, the health and wellness manager at the San Juan YMCA, one of the island’s largest fitness facilities which runs exercise classes and programmes for children, agrees that finances play an important part in parents’ decisions. “When it costs $1.30 for a bottle of water, and 90 cents for a can of soda, what is that parent going to do?” he said.

      But he also believes that better education for parents costs nothing and that simple steps can be taken to improve children’s health.

      “We had a 10-year-old at summer camp who weighed 167lb,” Negron said. “I asked his mother if she took him to the park and she said no because she didn’t want him to hurt himself. Yet she sent him in every day with two slices of pizza for his lunch. She didn’t see that she was the one hurting him.

      “We have to take kids like that, educate their parents about nutrition, get them away from their computers and into the park. Don’t buy them a PS4; buy them a bicycle. Give them hope. It will be more effective than a crazy law.”

      Senator Valle did not respond to an interview request or questions about his proposals sent by the Guardian, but Dr Fontanet said he had discussed the measure with him and that the politician did not expect it to become law.

      “He said, ‘I just want to shake the tree so everyone sees this,’” he said. A number of public meetings will take place in Puerto Rico this spring, before debate continues in the island’s senate.

      Nikhol, meanwhile, has begun working with a nutritionist and taking more exercise in an attempt to lose weight, which she says is nothing to do with the proposed law. She has already lost 10lb, she says, and wants to be below 200lb by the end of the school year in June.

      “I’m on the school basketball team and I want to be more healthy and to weigh less,” she said. “It’s something I need to do for myself.”
      The controversial bill would allow the government to ‘educate’ families of obese children and levy increasingly heavy fines against those who fail to lose weight. Many are outraged: ‘I could lose my daughter because I feed her? It’s ridiculous’


      Letting your kids get fat = child abuse. A fine seems appropriate

      Comment


      • #4
        If he thinks kids should be free to eat junk food then he can spend his own money feeding crap to his obee spawn all he wants. He should stop demanding tax payers foot the bill though.
        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #5
          Stop promoting child abuse.

          Comment


          • #6
            Trans fat cause cancer

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Dinner View Post
              If he thinks kids should be free to eat junk food then he can spend his own money feeding crap to his obee spawn all he wants. He should stop demanding tax payers foot the bill though.
              You're one to talk
              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

              Comment


              • #8
                How so? When have I ever demanded tax payers give me anything? After all that is what I just said shouldn't happen, man child.
                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
                  You're one to talk
                  You should be nicer to the people who pay your salary.
                  “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                  ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
                    You're one to talk
                    that's hilarious coming from a beneficiary of what is perhaps the world's largest welfare programme.
                    "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                    "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      1. I work longer hours than I've worked at any job in the private sector.

                      2. Oerdin is obese.
                      "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
                      "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
                        1. I work longer hours than I've worked at any job in the private sector.

                        2. Oerdin is obese.
                        1. Obviously those long hours count as entertainment /sarcasm

                        2. Did you stalk him on the internet and find photos of him...?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by giblets View Post
                          2. Did you stalk him on the internet and find photos of him...?
                          This wouldn't shock me.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I can attest that while Oerdin is overweight, he is not obese.
                            “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

                            ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              “Obesity is a disease, not a choice made by parents or their children,” said Dr Nikhil Dhurandhar, president of the Maryland-based Obesity Society.
                              Bollocks.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X