The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
It seems that to SOME (happy?) murican zombies, a difference of opinion or perspective can indeed only be justified by drugs (they know all about it after all) or a delusional state.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
I don't know what you are talking about, but I assume it is the phenomenon known as refraction that is clearly visible on the right side of the windscreen.
Ok, let's say you're right. Then what about this screenshot, taken by me from that, now official video, at 3:24 (video downloaded from youtube and then one image from it saved with Media Player Classic - Home Cinema, then edited with red marker in windows paint).
So, i see a sign, a ramp of a trailer with a sunlight on it (better to check it on original video, looks like sunlight to me, it becomes awfully obvious 5 frames later, but then we don't see shadow on the same image).
But there is no trailer ramp on a shadow. If there is sunlight on a ramp, sunlight should fall to the road too because there are no other things blocking sunlight. But shadow is a straight line. So, here, i proven that that video is a 100% fake.
But your western media won't tell you that your western "criminal investigation team" are scammers, right?
When I read the news from "WESTERN MEDIA" I can find two sources (usually more) that say the exact opposite, which is good so I can read both sides of a story. They all can't be propaganda or they'd all be saying the same thing.
As i said, please find me two mainstream western media sources that say the exact opposite about MH17.
You'll not find it even in wikipedia article that is supposed to be "neutral" and "encyclopedic".
funny pic, probably done in the same studios as those moon thingies. Non-parallel shadows never forget!!!
Picture is mine. And i actually posted how i done it, everyone can do it in 5 minutes of time.
Original video is here, if you magically forgot it. Besides, it's actually seen on a video too if you know where to look.
As i said, please find me two mainstream western media sources that say the exact opposite about MH17.
You'll not find it even in wikipedia article that is supposed to be "neutral" and "encyclopedic".
Except for the release of the latest investigation, there has been nothing for months. And all they released was the summary from the report.
So there couldn't be opposite reports on this issue. I didn't see any that editorialized on the results.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Ok, let's say you're right. Then what about this screenshot, taken by me from that, now official video, at 3:24 (video downloaded from youtube and then one image from it saved with Media Player Classic - Home Cinema, then edited with red marker in windows paint).
[ATTACH=CONFIG]178757[/ATTACH]
So, i see a sign, a ramp of a trailer with a sunlight on it (better to check it on original video, looks like sunlight to me, it becomes awfully obvious 5 frames later, but then we don't see shadow on the same image).
But there is no trailer ramp on a shadow. If there is sunlight on a ramp, sunlight should fall to the road too because there are no other things blocking sunlight. But shadow is a straight line. So, here, i proven that that video is a 100% fake.
But your western media won't tell you that your western "criminal investigation team" are scammers, right?
What? I haven't seen the video (and don't intend to), but the shadow you mark red isn't that of the sign you mark red, but that of the (sunlit) fuel tank (or whatever it is) just forward from the rear wheels.
What? I haven't seen the video (and don't intend to), but the shadow you mark red isn't that of the sign you mark red, but that of the (sunlit) fuel tank (or whatever it is) just forward from the rear wheels.
Nope. Cabin is blue, fuel tank is yellow, red is the same as on the previous picture, and green is supposedly "buk". There are no shadows on a video that are even longer than green (other than trees, but they have obvious shape and are moving relative to other shadows, so it's impossible to mistake them with supposedly a "buk" shadow), so green must be "buk". And red shadow is obviously wrong.
Come to think about it, shouldn't Buk shadow be longer compared to a trailer cabin shadow?
P.S. Tree shadows aren't moving (looks like trailer is not moving), but it's obvious where they are anyway, they're semi-transparent and have random shape - pink in this picture.
As i said, please find me two mainstream western media sources that say the exact opposite about MH17.
You'll not find it even in wikipedia article that is supposed to be "neutral" and "encyclopedic".
Oh, they relate the lies Putin is telling but, no, their job is bot to sell Putin's lies. Their job is to fact check andnone of the facts are on Putin's side. That is why Russia no longer has a free media and tge dictator made sure only his lies could be told.
In a private meeting with Syrians, the secretary of state expressed frustration with Russia, the Obama administration’s failure to back diplomacy with force, and the shrinking prospects for a cease-fire. Listen to his conversation.
“The problem is the Russians don’t care about international law, and we do.”
Kerry talks about Syria. He tells it on a meeting with Syrian terrorists supported by USA. USA has no justification to meddle in Syrian affairs or to support terrorists in Syria. Russia, on the other hand, is invited to Syria by a legal democratically elected government of Syria.
And New York Times doesn't say "Kerry told total bull**** about who cares about international law in Syria, and who doesn't". It's not even a lie, it's such a ridiculous lie that it becomes a bull**** full of lie.
No, NYT tells that "His frustrations and dissent within the Obama administration have hardly been a secret, but in the recorded conversation, Mr. Kerry lamented being outmaneuvered by the Russians, expressed disagreement with some of Mr. Obama’s policy decisions and said Congress would never agree to use force."
Damn, poor Kerry, he's frustrated and dissented by that bad, bad Congress that doesn't want to start a war with Russia. I mean, bad Russia is helping it's longstanding ally Syria to fight terrorists, and Kerry doesn't like it, so he wants to start a war. And Congress won't let him. Bwa ha ha. Cry me a river. That's what NYT says.
Tweet
Comment