They finally solved Benghazi

[Sava]

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a300383445d5a90dd6ca764c9e15/house-intel-panel-debunks-many-benghazi-theories

BUT MAYBE THAT'S JUST WHAT OBAMA WANTS YOU TO THINK


If you were a Benghazi truther, I'll allow you to publicly apologize to the rest of America in this thread without insulting you.

[AAAAAAAAH!]

Now what are the Republicans supposed to campaign on in 2016?

[Sava]

I hope it's "abuse of executive power".

[loinburger]

Death panels

[OneFootInTheGrave]

Ebola.

[Kidlicious]

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ecc3a...ghazi-theories





BUT MAYBE THAT'S JUST WHAT OBAMA WANTS YOU TO THINK


If you were a Benghazi truther, I'll allow you to publicly apologize to the rest of America in this thread without insulting you.

Why are you expecting an apology?

[SlowwHand]

It's just bull****.

[Thoth]

Ebola.

[Sava]

It's just bull****.

I gave you an opportunity. Whatever happens next is your own fault.

[Berzerker]

hillary is off the hook?

[DinoDoc]

hillary is off the hook?

For anything other than incompetence, probably.

[dannubis]

It's just bull****.

Thank you for finally seeing the light

[Donegeal]

Now what are the Republicans supposed to campaign on in 2016?

Republicans don't let facts interfere in their campaign platforms. Why would that change now?

[Sava]

Republicans don't let facts interfere in their campaign platforms. Why would that change now?

Indeed.

Case in point:

For anything other than incompetence, probably.

DD is becoming as fact resistant as HC and reg... at least, openly

there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

I'm getting to the point where I think it may just be better to let the inmates/patients freely express themselves without much consternation on my part. After all, they are completely harmless, irrelevant, and making fools of themselves at every opportunity.

Why risk stopping that?

[DinoDoc]

DD is becoming as fact resistant as HC and reg... at least, openly

I wasn't alleging any of those things in the quoted statement.