When liberals oppress each other

[ZEE]

I don't want this thrade to die yet so I am Putting a Poast in it.

[Sava]

sigh

[Lonestar]

So basically you want to talk about how manly you are while abdicating all responsibility for your kid.

[Kidlicious]

So basically you want to talk about how manly you are while abdicating all responsibility for your kid.

Are you always this stupid?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

You're the uncle. YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER!

If you were their father I would hope you would expect them to be at your house half the time. And if they were, WHY WOULD YOU SEND THEIR MOTHER MONEY?!

In order to coordinate fair splitting of non-subsistence expenses, of course. Such as clothes, educational bills etc. How are you splitting those?

[Kidlicious]

In order to coordinate fair splitting of non-subsistence expenses, of course. Such as clothes, educational bills etc. How are you splitting those?

If it's a large expense, and the parents can't work it out (which will often be the case), a judge will decide. The more responsible parent will always give more support though. That's the case now.


The really bad part of the present system is that it causes conflict. The parents act badly. They try to alienate the other parent. People really do show their true colors after a divorce. Sadly, it's child abuse. But the bad parent never sees it that way. With shared parenting both parents are treated as equals and there is less tendency for bad behavior.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

If it's a large expense, and the parents can't work it out (which will often be the case), a judge will decide. The more responsible parent will always give more support though. That's the case now.

That's explaining away the problem, not explaining it.

A typical example- it's a new year at school. Your kid needs new uniform, equipment etc. It's about $500 and comes around every year. How do you split that in your 50/50 possession deal without communicating, or getting a Judge involved (which would be mad)?

[Kidlicious]

That's explaining away the problem, not explaining it.

A typical example- it's a new year at school. Your kid needs new uniform, equipment etc. It's about $500 and comes around every year. How do you split that in your 50/50 possession deal without communicating, or getting a Judge involved (which would be mad)?

It's not a problem. That particular example can be settled in the divorce just like where the child will spend holidays. One year the father pays. The next year the mother pays.

[Lonestar]

Are you always this stupid?

I like how you didn't deny it.

Grow up.

[Kidlicious]

I like how you didn't deny it.

Grow up.

[AAAAAAAAH!]

"Fathers" don't get equal custody. It seems that you are the ****** without any self-respect. I will leave you to your misery.

Wow, you mean the human that carries the child for nine months and in our society generally takes care of most of the parenting duties has an upper leg in attaining custody of the children from courts over the human that didn't do these things?

[Kidlicious]

Wow, you mean the human that carries the child for nine months and in our society generally takes care of most of the parenting duties has an upper leg in attaining custody of the children from courts over the human that didn't do these things?

How about this. If you don't want to be a father. Just a visitor in your childs life you can have that choice. When you meet someone who you want to marry, agree ahead of time that the children only have one parent, and that in the event I divorce she can have full custody.

I changed the diapers. Fed the child etc.. I did everything that the mother did. Unfortunately, as a man, I'm not treated equally. In the event of divorce I was not treated as a parent but as a visitor.

Are you getting it? I imagine not, because your post, like loins, cockneys etc.. highlights your belief that men are inferior to women. So continue on with your display.

[AAAAAAAAH!]

I had no idea society's traditional gender roles reflected a view of men as inferior to women.

[Kidlicious]

I had no idea society's traditional gender roles reflected a view of men as inferior to women.

Gibberish

[molly bloom]

What's not fascinating about the oppressed oppressing the oppressed?

You might want to read Eldridge Cleaver's revelatory 'Soul On Ice' where he talks about raping black women as preparation for raping white women.

As usual you're decades behind the times.

Also, an ex-Communist turned bongo-brained God botherer supposedly giving us the real skinny on liberals ? Hilarious.