My initial idea for this thread was to make fun of Kidicious, who has apparently been damaged beyond repair by his labial experiences, but that's been done to death - at this point I think we should just wait for him to enter the flaming homosexual stage in the Giancarlo metamorphosis.
So the secondary plan was to either find a funny work-safe image of labia, or else such a ridiculously non-work-safe image of labia that it would be worth getting banned for posting it. Best I could do was the following, meh
But my GIS for labia uncovered the fact that approximately 1/3 of the image results were of diseased labia - warts, tumors, and "vulval elephantiasis". What gives? Is there an angry divorced man working at Google who is responsible for boosting image results of diseased labia?
But no, that doesn't seem to be the answer - a GIS for "penis" resulted in about 1/3 of the returned images being diseased penises. Is there an angry Shaker working at Google responsible for both sets of search results? Are lots of people Googling for diseased genitalia and the search software is just following suit?
So the secondary plan was to either find a funny work-safe image of labia, or else such a ridiculously non-work-safe image of labia that it would be worth getting banned for posting it. Best I could do was the following, meh
But my GIS for labia uncovered the fact that approximately 1/3 of the image results were of diseased labia - warts, tumors, and "vulval elephantiasis". What gives? Is there an angry divorced man working at Google who is responsible for boosting image results of diseased labia?
But no, that doesn't seem to be the answer - a GIS for "penis" resulted in about 1/3 of the returned images being diseased penises. Is there an angry Shaker working at Google responsible for both sets of search results? Are lots of people Googling for diseased genitalia and the search software is just following suit?
Comment