The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
I'm going to rush out and write on a piece of paper that JESUS said his "gay lover" so a century or so down the road when someone looks at it, they'll realize that Jesus was Gay.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
I didn't realize it was an established belief of her religion that a piece of paper from the 6th to 9th centuries AD can't include the phrase, "Jesus said to them, my wife."
The original story didn't include this part..
Originally posted by Smithsonian
“She will be able to be my disciple,” says the next line. Then, two lines later: “I dwell with her.”
You're still not getting that there's no reason to believe this document is presenting literal truths about Jesus the historical figure. We know nothing about the context or authorship of this papyrus fragment. This simply isn't a compelling historical artifact about Jesus. It may be a compelling historical artifact of Egypt from the 6th to 9th centuries AD, but without more context it's hard to say. Remember, I say this as someone who in no way believes Jesus is the son of God or any other Christian belief.
What was the rest of the text?
After a lifetime of studying the various prophets from the Jewish Catskills, allow me to speculate.
We always hold hands. If I let go,"Jesus said to them, my wife." goes shopping.
"Jesus said to them, my wife "was at the beauty shop for two hours. That was only for the estimate. She got a mudpack and looked great for two days.. Then the mud fell off.
"Jesus said to them, my wife "and I went to a hotel where we got a waterbed. My wife called it the Dead Sea.
"Jesus said to them, my wife "asked me why Jewish divorces cost so much. I told her because they're worth it.
"Jesus said to them, my wife "loves Chinese food. I think that this is due to the fact that Won Ton spelled backward is Not Now.
I've been in love with the same woman for 20 years,"Jesus said to them, my wife." ever finds out who, she'll crucify me!
Ah yes, even more reasons to enjoy borscht belt humour.
Sounds like gnostic gospels which were written centuries after Jesus died. A lot of this sort of stuff popped up at the time though the Church worked hard to stamp it out as heretical.
Spot on. Some Gnostic texts refer to god as 'She'. Naturally, the established Church knew that god had a penis, not a vagina. See, if god was female, at least one city/cathedral/church would have a holy tampon reliquary.
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
You're still not getting that there's no reason to believe this document is presenting literal truths about Jesus the historical figure. We know nothing about the context or authorship of this papyrus fragment. This simply isn't a compelling historical artifact about Jesus. It may be a compelling historical artifact of Egypt from the 6th to 9th centuries AD, but without more context it's hard to say. Remember, I say this as someone who in no way believes Jesus is the son of God or any other Christian belief.
The reason I personally find it interesting is because from what I understand a lot of the strict adherence to Jesus being a single celibate man came about after his death as the church took on its form and started organizing itself. Him being a single celibate man would actually have been rather remarkable for the period so when evidence appears that suggests he was married, that isn't just a bolt out of the blue, it's a piece of supporting evidence for what to me is a much more logical theory.
Given that the date is so much later it doesn't provide anything particularly game changing, but it's certainly interesting and it appears to support the idea that at least some branches of Christianity were ok with the idea of a married Jesus centuries after his death.
Comment