And that Jefferson started the affair shortly after viewing a painting of Sarah presenting Hagar to Abraham?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Our scuzzy third president
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, that ol' Jefferson sure was a religious fanatic.
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostYes, our esteemed Founding Fathers were a bunch of slave-owning rapists and murderers who only became Founding Fathers because they didn't want to pay their taxes.
Politicians are horrible, horrible people, little better than criminals. It has always been thus.
Comment
-
Oh, and the taxes? They were mostly to pay for the very expensive defense of our vast frontier. We were a money-pit. They tried to lessen the cost by making a deal with various Indians that we would stop encroaching on their land, but that just made us angry and they had limited power to enforce it. So taxes it was. Which New Englanders circumvented by operating very profitable smuggling enterprises. Then got angry when the Brits cracked down on smuggling. Also, Southern landowners felt that their British agents were cheating them when they bought expensive foreign goods to ship across the Atlantic. Because that was better than admitting that their lifestyle was impractical and unsustainable. Finally, when trouble did break out Gov. Dunmore of VA offered freedom to any slaves and indentured servants who would rally to his aid. Outrageous.
Now, if we'd just had representation, they could have been fairly outvoted every time a new tax was proposed.Last edited by Elok; February 13, 2014, 09:02.
Comment
-
One thing about the "founders" is that they knew how to deal with anti-tax anti-government nutbags.
The Whiskey Rebellion.
Can you imagine if Obama sent troops to Wall Street to collect unpaid taxes by corporate America?
Now that would be awesomeTo us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sava View Post
Can you imagine if Obama sent troops to Wall Street to collect unpaid taxes by corporate America?"My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostWell, thanks Sava, now I can't get up from my desk lest everyone in the office think I'm a pervert.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostI'm going to check out Hamilton next, it sounds like they were sort of mirror images. In that they were both vicious hyperpartisans, sexually aggressive, and furthered their respective causes by means we would label treasonous today.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostYeah, that ol' Jefferson sure was a religious fanatic.
I've only started digging into the history, and while they all seem at least a little repulsive, Jefferson stands out. I'm reading an extremely sympathetic biography right now, and every third page the author has to say something like, "while his contemporaries, and most historians, found this behavior deeply hypocritical, he was really just being pragmatic." Kind of like, "she wasn't a hooker, she was a sexual gratification services consultant." I'm going to check out Hamilton next, it sounds like they were sort of mirror images. In that they were both vicious hyperpartisans, sexually aggressive, and furthered their respective causes by means we would label treasonous today.
Still he also wrote Virginia's statute on religious freedom... which is why modern day atheists respect him.
Then got angry when the Brits cracked down on smuggling.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
His (and his fellow anti-Federalists') fear of standing armies made the Revolution take twice as long as it needed to.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostHis (and his fellow anti-Federalists') fear of standing armies made the Revolution take twice as long as it needed to.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
Originally posted by molly bloom View PostAnd how much does that standing army cost you now ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostFair enough--but bear in mind that the militia mentality is the main reason we have the Second Amendment. Pointless wars or shot-up malls and preschools, take your pick. And it's not like the Founders' conception of a militia would be even remotely practical today.
history, historical, research, IHR-Info, Institute of Historical Research, history in focus, medical history, medicine
Your country seems to have been much readier in modern days at any rate, to use the National Guard/Army to either break up strikes or actually kill workers and strikers.
It does seem a curious outcome for a revolution supposedly about achieving freedoms from various different forms of tyranny- religious, political, economic...Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostFair enough--but bear in mind that the militia mentality is the main reason we have the Second Amendment. Pointless wars or shot-up malls and preschools, take your pick. And it's not like the Founders' conception of a militia would be even remotely practical today.
Comment
Comment