Originally posted by Al B. Sure!
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mitt Romney charged for racketeering.
Collapse
X
-
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostNor interesting. I took three tries to get through the paragraph of specific alleged misdeeds. Now regret the time spent."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patroklos View PostIs it called "charged" when its a civil suit?“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostMrFun assumes that every claim brought forward against Evil Big Business by a plaintiffs lawyer is legit, because lawsuits are never frivolous. They are heroically shifting money from people who produce things of value to people too stupid to avoid dumping extremely hot coffee on their dicks.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrFun View PostAnd Republicans keep posting as if they never lost the presidential election.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View PostOdd, I had no trouble whatsoever. While the suit is civil the allegations are criminal. It's not inconceivable that criminal charges could follow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostMrFun assumes that every claim brought forward against Evil Big Business by a plaintiffs lawyer is legit, because lawsuits are never frivolous. They are heroically shifting money from people who produce things of value to people too stupid to avoid dumping extremely hot coffee on their dicks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostI didn't realize McDonald's Coffee Moron was female."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ban Kenobi View PostYes, McDonald's is a heroic Job Creator valiantly creating value by serving coffee at unnecessarily high temperatures in spite of hundreds of previous complaints about customers getting burned by their coffee.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostNot particularly relevant.
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostAnd actually acknowledging the too high temperatures internally, but thinking that just paying settlements would be cheaper than actually making coffee that tasted good at normal coffee temps.
The real reason why the coffee was so hot is because people would be complaining about cold coffee when they drink it several minutes after buying. You've never worked in fast food, clearly, and had so many people come back with coffee or french fries (fries all the time!) 20 minutes later complaining that it's cold. It was hot when you bought it!"Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
-
McD's internal research showed that the vast majority of people drink the coffee immediately after purchase. So sorry, that won't fly.
The main reason Liebeck won punitive damages (which, remember are meant to punish, not for restitution) is because McD's hid and lied about a ton of stuff (so the jury decided to fine McD's for 2 days worth of sales of coffee - which turned out to be $2.7mil, of course it was dramatically reduced on appeal).“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
Comment