And they're up to no good, demanding tribute or pushing unequal treaties on us, how much of humanity's arsenal of missiles can be fired at them? Would it be possible to aim ICBMs at a target in space?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So suppose alien craft orbit earth
Collapse
X
-
So suppose alien craft orbit earth
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.Tags: None
-
Depends on what orbit they're in.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
-
Apogee on ICBMs is pretty respectable (>500km). There is a reasonable chance that you could detonate close enough to something orbiting at a lower altitude and do significant damage.
For anything further up you would need to mount a nuke on a satellite launch vehicle.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostDepends on what orbit they're in.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostApogee on ICBMs is pretty respectable (>500km). There is a reasonable chance that you could detonate close enough to something orbiting at a lower altitude and do significant damage.
For anything further up you would need to mount a nuke on a satellite launch vehicle.
Also, putting a nuclear warhead in a satellite launch vehicle would not be difficult. Plenty of warheads in the US enduring stockpile are small enough to fit both weight/volume-wise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KrazyHorse View PostApogee on ICBMs is pretty respectable (>500km). There is a reasonable chance that you could detonate close enough to something orbiting at a lower altitude and do significant damage.
For anything further up you would need to mount a nuke on a satellite launch vehicle.
A brief search indicates the speed of ICBMs tend to be below escape velocity.
I guess SAM are off the table as well. Very disappointing.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Colon™ View PostI suppose that's not possible on short notice.
A brief search indicates the speed of ICBMs tend to be below escape velocity.
I guess SAM are off the table as well. Very disappointing.
Comment
-
But how many of those do we have?DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
I for one welcome our new ET overlords.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Nukes in space behave quite differently than nukes in an atmosphere. Very limited blast, but high intensity gamma radiation and a good EMP. Both gamma rays and the EMP could be blocked with a plasma shield.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
If they're so technologically advanced that they're capable of interstellar flight would we want to piss them off? They might simply dodge our missiles, then throw big rocks at us.
I hate to break it to you guys, but there is no galactic treaty banning mass drivers."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment