Lesbian Feminist Whores Sexually Molest and Physically Attack Catholic Boys

[C0ckney]

Have massive amounts of influence does not justify violence when an organization exists in a democratic society.

It'd be like (albeit this would be self-defeating and no one would ever do this) justifying violence against the NRA for its power and pervasiveness in American policy on guns.

lots of social advances have been won, or helped by, protests, strikes, civil disobedience and yes, even violence.

(and this is also a response to dd's post 66) the point is not so much to win hearts and minds with the action itself, but rather to get people thinking and talking about the issue. because, with women's rights, like say, universal suffrage or slavery, once people start asking and discussing the question "should women have control over their own bodies?" it's fairly clear which side is going to win. there are arguments against women having control of their bodies, but those arguments, like those in favour of slavery or against universal suffrage, are actually pretty weak.

[C0ckney]

How much influence does feminism have in Sweden? If someone says something I don't like can I rub my dick on them?

i honestly have no idea what you are talking about.

[C0ckney]

How would you describe using violent means in an attempt to suppress the legitimate speech of a group you disagree with?

well that's obviously not what happened, but anyway here's a definition of totalitarian.

Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed

[Kidlicious]

i honestly have no idea what you are talking about.

Recently a man was forced to take a drug test because he has muscles. Is it ok for him to rub his dick on the police woman?

[DinoDoc]

Do you have fantasies of rubbing your dick on random women?

[DinoDoc]

(and this is also a response to dd's post 66) the point is not so much to win hearts and minds with the action itself, but rather to get people thinking and talking about the issue.

And you believe that was accomplished here?

[C0ckney]

Recently a man was forced to take a drug test because he has muscles. Is it ok for him to rub his dick on the police woman?

recently a turtle was found playing a trombone in a park, should he have opened a savings account?

[C0ckney]

And you believe that was accomplished here?

i don't read the argentinian press much, but i would imagine that such an incident would invite comment and discussion around the issues involved.

[Imran Siddiqui]

lots of social advances have been won, or helped by, protests, strikes, civil disobedience and yes, even violence.

(and this is also a response to dd's post 66) the point is not so much to win hearts and minds with the action itself, but rather to get people thinking and talking about the issue. because, with women's rights, like say, universal suffrage or slavery, once people start asking and discussing the question "should women have control over their own bodies?" it's fairly clear which side is going to win. there are arguments against women having control of their bodies, but those arguments, like those in favour of slavery or against universal suffrage, are actually pretty weak.

One does not cheer for or defend violence for "social advances". At best, we understand why violence may be used because those who are using such violence are voiceless otherwise (a la Nelson Mandela, PLO, etc). This is not the case here.

On your secondary paragraph, it depends if you are trying to force the debate into that question. Abortion rights are FAR more than "do women have control over their own bodies". That is the reason why most countries put limits in the 3rd trimester. There is another life to contend with there. Making into such a simplistic question is completely the wrong thing to do.

[DinoDoc]

I don't read the Argentinian press much, but I would imagine that such an incident would invite comment and discussion around the issues involved.

a) The shift key exists for a reason.
b) I would imagine that such an event would by its very nature obscure and drown out any discussion it might seek to promote.

[Kidlicious]

recently a turtle was found playing a trombone in a park, should he have opened a savings account?

What do you hope to accomplish here by not answering questions and spouting off nonsense?

[Kidlicious]

Do you have fantasies of rubbing your dick on random women?

Random woman?

[Patroklos]

no offence irman, but i think you underestimate the power and pervasiveness of the catholic church in latin american societies.

Via a compelling message people freely follow that competes fairly in the democratic market of ideas.

The fact that your message fails in such circumstances and you feel you must resort to violence does not speak to any nefarious effort on the part of he Catholic Church, but rather the weakness of your position followed by your own lack of confidence in it, so much so that you have abandoned convincing people and resorted to compelling them . Congratulations?

[regexcellent]

c0ckney can no longer complain when I advocate the overthrow of democratically elected communist governments.

[Kidlicious]

I don't understand how he can complain if I go punch a random feminist in the stomach for what they just did. I'm trying to get a straight answer out of him.