Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

European Union takes tougher stance on Israeli settlements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • European Union takes tougher stance on Israeli settlements

    The other thread about the death of Helen Thomas made me think of the latest news regarding Israel.

    'Earthquake' directive will prohibit EU states from signing deals with Israel unless settlement exclusion clause is included

    The European Union has dealt a harsh blow to the Israeli settlement enterprise in a directive that insists all future agreements between the EU and Israel must explicitly exclude Jewish colonies in the West Bank or East Jerusalem.

    The move, described by an Israeli official as an "earthquake", prompted furious criticism from the Israeli prime minister over "external diktats".

    But it was hailed by Palestinians and their supporters as a significant political and economic sanction against settlements.

    The EU guidelines will prohibit the issuing of grants, funding, prizes or scholarships unless a settlement exclusion clause is included. Israeli institutions and bodies situated across the pre-1967 Green Line – including the Golan Heights, occupied by Israel in 1967 and later annexed — will be automatically ineligible.

    In order to secure agreements with the EU in the future, the Israeli government will be required to concede in writing that settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are outside the state of Israel.

    The directive, part of the 2014-20 financial framework, covers all areas of co-operation between the EU and Israel, including economics, science, culture, sports and academia.

    In a broadcast statementon Tuesday evening , Binyamin Netanyahu said: "As prime minister of Israel, I will not allow the hundreds of thousands of Israelis who live in the West Bank, Golan Heights and our united capital Jerusalem to be harmed. We will not accept any external diktats about our borders. This matter will only be settled in direct negotiations between the parties."

    The move was seen in Israel as a penalty that could in future extend to settlement produce and goods destined for European markets.

    Israel has become increasingly concerned about the EU adopting a more robust stance against settlements. Some member states are pressing for an EU-wide policy of labelling produce and goods originating in settlements to allow consumers to make informed choices on purchases.

    An EU statement said the guidelines "set out the territorial limitations under which the commission will award EU support to Israeli entities … concern has been expressed in Europe that Israeli entities in the occupied territories could benefit from EU support. The purpose of these guidelines is to make a distinction between the state of Israel and the occupied territories when it comes to EU support."

    The directive follows a decision by EU foreign ministers last December that "all agreements between the state of Israel and the EU must unequivocally and explicitly indicate their inapplicability to the territories occupied by Israel in 1967". All Israeli settlements are illegal under international law.

    Other Israeli government ministers weighed in with criticism. The centrist finance minister, Yair Lapid, said the EU move "pushes peace further away instead of bringing it closer" and was "another in a long line of decisions that isolate Israel". He urged a return to peace talks, adding: "This is a miserable decision, which was made in very bad timing and thus sabotages the efforts that US secretary of state John Kerry is putting into bringing the sides back to the negotiation table."

    Ze'ev Elkin, Israel's rightwing deputy foreign minister who lives in a West Bank settlement, told Army Radio the directive was a "big mistake", saying: "This is more fuel for Palestinian rejectionism."

    Another minister, Silvan Shalom, said: "Once again, Europe has demonstrated just how detached it is, how it can't really be a full partner to the negotiations."

    A senior Israeli official, who declined to be identified, told the Guardian: "Israel will have to explicitly express in writing the EU's position. We don't believe the EU's position should be forced down our throats like geese." He said it was impossible for Israel to agree to such a demand.

    The directive would affect "all realms of co-operation", he added, and would result in "rising tension and increased friction" and "create a lot of bad blood".

    Another Israeli official told Haaretz, which disclosed the new guidelines, the move was an "earthquake" that unprecedentedly turns "understandings and quiet agreements that the [EU] does not work beyond the Green Line [into] formal, binding policy".

    Hanan Ashrawi, a senior Palestinian official, welcomed the guidelines. "The EU has moved from the level of statements, declarations and denunciations to effective policy decisions and concrete steps, which constitute a qualitative shift that will have a positive impact on the chances of peace," she said.

    "The Israeli occupation must be held to account, and Israel must comply with international and humanitarian law and the requirements for justice and peace."

    The new requirements would affect the EuroMed Youth agreement, under negotiation, which involves joint youth projects and exchanges, said Haaretz.

    Another example would be applications from Israel to the EU's research and technical development programme, an EU source told the Guardian.

    The directive emerged as Kerry arrived in the region on his sixth visit in a drive to restart peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. He is expected to meet the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, in Amman on Tuesday.

    Unusually, the secretary of state is not scheduled to visit Jerusalem or meet the Israeli prime minister. Some analysts have suggested this is because Israel has signed up to Kerry's parameters for a resumption of talks, but he still needs agreement from the Palestinian side.

    However, an unnamed Israeli minister was reported by Israel Radio as saying that Netanyahu's primary objective was merely to show willingness to negotiate and that he did not intend to engage in a far-reaching peace process.
    Seems like the EU finally put its money where its mouth is.
    "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
    "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

  • #2
    it's a good start, but there's a lot more that could be done.
    "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

    "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

    Comment


    • #3
      Europeans being nasty to Jews. How novel.
      John Brown did nothing wrong.

      Comment


      • #4
        Important to notice this only includes the EU's own offices, there is no limit on member states' policies and offices.
        Do not fear, for I am with you; Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.-Isaiah 41:10
        I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made - Psalms 139.14a
        Also active on WePlayCiv.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah like settlements even ****ing matter next to shooting ATGMs at school buses.

          Comment


          • #6
            It's nice to know that even as Europe becomes secular, they don't abandon the sacred tradition of jew-hating.
            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
            ){ :|:& };:

            Comment


            • #7
              Because disagreeing with Israeli actions is anti-Semitic. Why do you constantly undermine your credibility?
              “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
              "Capitalism ho!"

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DaShi View Post
                Because disagreeing with Israeli actions is anti-Semitic. Why do you constantly undermine your credibility?
                Yes it is. Either you support Israel 100% or you're the next Hitler and want to kill all the Jews.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                  Yeah like settlements even ****ing matter next to shooting ATGMs at school buses.
                  has it ever occured to you that these might be linked?
                  "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                  "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                    It's nice to know that even as Europe becomes secular, they don't abandon the sacred tradition of jew-hating.
                    As part of my daily routine I spit on one every morning and say Heil Hitler three times before dinner.
                    DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      HC is becoming a "Stereotyped thing stupid Americans say" bot.

                      If he is, it's a relatively clever bot. Well coded.
                      Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
                      Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
                      We've got both kinds

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
                        Yeah like settlements even ****ing matter next to shooting ATGMs at school buses.
                        If the EU makes deals with the Palestinians, I assume they will include a "no money for heavy weaponry" clause there, just for the sake of fairness.
                        1011 1100
                        Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          It's nice to know that even as Europe becomes secular, they don't abandon the sacred tradition of jew-hating.
                          And when did the U.S. give it up ?

                          HC is becoming a "Stereotyped thing stupid Americans say" bot.
                          I'd agree save for the 'becoming' . 'Has become' is in fact the proper grammatical usage.
                          Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                          ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            That's only because Hezbollah has been fighting jew-hating Al Qaeda in Syria.
                            DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Elok View Post
                              If the EU makes deals with the Palestinians, I assume they will include a "no money for heavy weaponry" clause there, just for the sake of fairness.
                              We will be handing out free copies of Mein Kampf though.
                              DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X