Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why No Thread About Colorado and Talk There Of Seceding?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
    AHAHAHA. Texas > Illinois.
    Yes, Illinois has set the bar really really low. It is one of the least fiscally sound states in the union currently, without much hope in the future.
    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View Post
      AHAHAHA. Texas > Illinois.
      Yes, Illinois has set the bar really really low. It is one of the least fiscally sound states in the union currently, without much hope in the future.
      It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
      RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

      Comment


      • #48
        Yep...That was worth saying twice.
        "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

        Comment


        • #49
          Damn, A JM. Haven't done one of those in years.
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • #50
            It's hard to be as prolific as the original master.
            "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
            "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by PLATO View Post
              True in an awful lot of cases.

              Based on Senator party:

              Blue States get $1.24 for every dollar taxed
              Mixed States receive $1.12 for every dollar taxed
              Red States receive $1.49 for every dollar taxed.
              I'm highly confused. How do all 3 kinds of states get > $1 for every dollar taxed by a large margin?
              <Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
              I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.

              Comment


              • #52
                There's obviously a 4th kind of state that gets considerably less than a dollar.
                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
                  I'm highly confused. How do all 3 kinds of states get > $1 for every dollar taxed by a large margin?
                  Budget deficit. Hello??
                  "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    And Illinois still gets less that a buck. Figures.
                    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Colorado is really busy right now trying to fight the feds.

                      Originally posted by HP
                      Drone Hunting In Deer Trail, Colorado? Town Considers Bounty For Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

                      Residents of Deer Trail, Colo., a small town 60 miles east of Denver, are considering an ordinance to issue hunting licenses for drones and a bounty system to reward anyone who shoots down or damages an unmanned aerial vehicle.

                      "They fly in town, they get shot down," explained Phillip Steel, the Deer Trail resident who drafted the anti-drone ordinance, per Denver's 7News.

                      A draft of the anti-drone ordinance, provided by DeerTrailColorado.com, would allow the town to issue an unlimited number of drone-hunting licenses for $25 each, so long as those issuing the licenses follow basic guidlines.

                      No background checks would be required, and all licenses would be "issued on an anonymous basis." Additionally, there's no residency requirement, so long as the hunting occurs within Deer Trail only. The license applicant must also be older than 21 and "able to read and understand English."

                      Those who are successful in shooting down or damaging a drone will be rewarded for their marksmanship. Bring in a fuselage or a wing with markings from the U.S. government, and the town will pay you $25. A whole drone? That's worth $100.

                      Town leaders acknowledge the ordinance is mostly symbolic, particularly as drone-hunting weapons are restricted to shotguns "12 gauge or smaller." There's also no shortage of pesky federal laws standing in their way, even though the measure asserts Deer Trail is "a sovereign political entity" entitled to maintain the security of its airspace.

                      "It's all novelty," Deer Trail Mayor Franks Fields cautioned to 7News, prompting Steel to respond: "To him it's a novelty, yes. To me, I'm serious."

                      The measure will go before the town council at its next meeting, scheduled for August 6.

                      If they don't pass it, "I will get my 25 signatures that I need on a petition and will force a special election to pass [it as a] citizen's initiative," Steel told the I-70 Scout, a newspaper in Eastern Colorado.

                      "I am pretty sure the whole thing is [illegal]," he continued, "but I would love to argue that in court. It is also against the law and the constitution to conduct covert surveillance on American citizens."
                      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...usaolp00000003

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X