Drug tests for CEOs.

[Dinner]

I don't post threads like this.

[loinburger]

It would be a lot less nonsensical if we punished the entirety of a company if some suitable sample size of its employees were shown to be taking drugs (instead of MrFun's retarded idea of punishing the entire company for actions taken by its CEO that has nothing to do with the running of the company). This sample size ought to be weighted according to a. the importance of the person taking the drug and b. the wickedness of taking the drug, for example 100 mailroom clerks taking a drug is equal to 10 executive assistants taking a drug is equal to 1 CEO taking a drug, and 100 people smoking crack is equal to 10 people using meth or heroin is equal to 1 person using cocaine (since crack is the drug of the inner city and therefore it's wrong to punish people for using it, while cocaine is the drug of rich white people and therefore its use should be disproportionately punished) - marijuana is not a drug for purposes of meting out punishment, and in fact if somebody uses marijuana as well as another drug then the wickedness of the other drug is reduced by 50% (though at the same time if the person smokes cigars and does drugs then the wickedness of their drug use is doubled).

[Dinner]

Still, this thread is better than Wiggy's anal sex thread so don't be too harsh to Mr Fun.

[Wiglaf]

There is really no other way to say this : IF I WERE A SCHOOL BUS DRIVER AND MR FUN WAS MY PASSENGER I WOULD NOT DEPLOY THE LITTLE FLASHING RED STOP SIGNS WHEN DROPPING HIM OFF. I do not actively wish him harm but if it happened and nature took its corese I would be ticketed at best.

[Sava]

I don't post threads like this.

yes
you do

[Elok]

I don't post threads like this.

Nah, you're just a racist liberal counterpart to DinoDoc. If it makes you feel better, I think he's winning right now.

EDIT: By "he" I mean MrFun, not DinoDoc.

Loin, you're putting about five hundred times more thought into this than MrFun did. Please stop; it doesn't deserve that level of consideration.

[Dinner]

Bah, and you're just a perpetually unhappy aspie who enjoys talking smack to everyone else.

[Elok]

Bah, and you're just a perpetually unhappy aspie who enjoys talking smack to everyone else.

Sure, why not. Ten-four.

[Sava]

[rah]

Every one should be able to take drugs as long as it doesn't impact their work. (like school bus drivers)
Most CEO's performance would not be impacted by most drugs.

I thought we had more libertarians here.

[Guynemer]

Bah, and you're just a perpetually unhappy aspie who enjoys talking smack to everyone else.

He also happens to be 100% accurate in his assessment of you. So, you know. Cheers, I guess.

[Dinner]

One deserves to be compared to DinoDoc. That's just low.

[DinoDoc]

Nah, you're just a racist liberal counterpart to DinoDoc.

I'm neither always wrong nor have I made openly racist posts as Oerdin has. I strenuously reject this comparison.

[loinburger]

I think that was supposed to be read as "you're like Dinodoc except that you're liberal and racist"

[Elok]

If I meant that DD was racist too, there would've been no need to mention it. Kinda like I wouldn't describe Pol Pot as "a Communist Kim Jong Il."