Originally posted by onodera
View Post
Mbeki wasn't great, but the disaster that is Zuma can't be blamed on Mandela. And even Zuma is nothing like what would have happened if not for Mandela.
I have been there and I am married to a South African.
If not for Mandela, people worse than Malema would be in charge (and even Zuma isn't that bad, considering). Malema is one of the leaders of the ANC and was calling for the murder of white people in 2011 (he was the leader of the Youth League). There are many whites who hold similar views of africans.
Relations in South Africa were terrible. Worse than the US even after the Civil War, I think. To compare Zimbabwe and South Africa, I have heard the average Zimbabweans described as gentle, intellectuals, and educated compared to the average South Africans being agressive, anti-intellectual, and uneducated. You would have expected things to be worse in South Africa than Zimbabwe.
The Africans in South African are extremely under educated. They were taught how to be laborers and only taught how to be laborers. Older people where not even taught to read. All achievements were described as coming from white europeans, white europeans were taught as being angelic in all facets (Hitler wasn't taught about because it would spoil the notion of the moral white man).
Things are changing, and fast, but it will be a long time before the Africans will responsibly be part of the democracy. In the short term it would probably have been better for Mandela's faction of the ANC to have taken dictatorial control. However, this would have made sure they were screwed in the long term (and likely the middle term too, the extreme factions of the ANC are strong).
JM
Comment