Tweet
Originally posted by Elok
View Post
-
Wrath of Khan gets 91%DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts. -
When it came out, Gene Weingarten compared it to the utter dreck produced in the early days of cinema, citing a "film" that was just footage of people doing pratfalls for a couple of minutes. The point being that people will drastically lower their standards where novel technology is concerned. Our kids, raised on (hopefully) less abysmally stupid movies made with the same if not better technology, will laugh at the rave reviews for Avatar.Comment
-
You let your own personal bias color your judgement too much. It makes you a poor critic. Avatar had many redeeming qualities that made up for its generic/recycled plot, which in itself, isn't a good criticism.Originally posted by Elok View Post“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"Comment
Comment