HIGH FIVE
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Taiwan strategy conspiracy
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThe best Jack Ryan was Alec Baldwin. I wanted to like Harrison Ford's portrayal, but Patriot Games (the movie, that is) just sucked.
And I'd watch this movie too
I liked Harrison in Clear and Present Danger.
But I agree that Hunt was the best of them.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostBut I agree that Hunt was the best of them."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
The non-Clancy portions of this thread echo another thread on another island off the coast of another country not that long ago... though the power differential is shifted of course.
Realistically, China could probably occupy Taiwan, but not perhaps without taking too long to do it; the US could stop NK from being a significant threat and then shift forces south before China could finish the job.<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.
Comment
-
Interesting read for those that are interested:
What would a China U.S. War look like?
Any Chinese move to take over Taiwan would trigger a confrontation with the U.S. Navy and Air Force. Is the U.S. prepared to counter this growing threat?
Add a Korean conflict and Clancy would be writing up a storm."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
It is quite possible that the Chinese could provide enough problems for the U.S. Navy to effectively keep them from Taiwan long enough to launch a successful invasion.
This article from December 2010
The Chinese have made significant progress on a missile system designed to sink a moving aircraft carrier from nearly 2,000 miles away, according to the top U.S. commander in the Pacific.
China’s anti-ship missile system has reached the rough equivalent of what the U.S. military terms as “initial operational capability,” Adm. Robert Willard, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, said in an interview with Japan’s Asahi newspaper Tuesday.
At the heart of the system is the Dong Feng 21D, a mobile, land-based missile that is projected to strike a carrier from between 1,200 and 1,800 miles, depending on its payload and other factors.
Willard said that the “component parts of the anti-ship ballistic missile have been developed and tested,” according to Asahi.
The missile has not yet been flight-tested over water, Willard acknowledged.
The Defense Department broadly defines initial operational capability as when a unit has the ability to employ and maintain a weapon it has received, although it may still require refinement before reaching “full operational capability” and wide distribution, according to the Defense Acquisition University in Fort Belvoir, Va.
Nevertheless, if China has mastered the complexities of striking a moving ship with a ballistic missile, it would be the only country to possess such a weapon. The United States relies on other weapon systems to attack ships.
Willard’s revelation about the system adds to growing concerns in the United States and Japan about China’s rapidly modernizing military and its increasingly aggressive actions in the Pacific.
Reports of Chinese naval activity in international waters near Okinawa, a diplomatic row between Japan and China over an island chain claimed by both countries and a contentious U.S. arms sale to Taiwan this year have increased tension in the region. In its National Defense Program Guideline released Dec. 17, Japan called China’s growing military and its lack of transparency as “a matter of concern for the region and the international community.”
China, meanwhile, claims that its military rise is defensive in nature and not aimed at any country in particular.
However, Willard said, combined with China’s air and naval advancements and power projections in the region, the Dong Feng 21D signals China’s move to expand its capability of denying access to regional waters.
China’s priorities reflect obvious future aspirations to become a “global military,” Willard said.
For now, their focus is on “what they term their near seas — the Bohai, Yellow Sea, South China Sea, East China Sea,” Willard said.
China still considers Taiwan, located in the East China Sea across the Taiwan Strait, as its sovereign territory, despite its split from the mainland government in 1949.
During past security crises in the South China Sea, Beijing has launched missiles and staged amphibious assault exercises near Taiwan. It did so most notably in 1996, after it appeared that a candidate favoring Taiwan independence would win.
In response, the United States sent two aircraft carrier groups to the Taiwan Strait, after which China ceased its military escalation. The U.S. has dispatched an aircraft carrier near the Taiwan Strait during every successive presidential election in Taiwan.
An active Dong Feng 21D missile arsenal would complicate that strategy.
“The strongest argument for obtaining (the anti-ship missile) capability is keeping the U.S. Navy from intervening in Taiwan,” said Denny Roy, a senior fellow at the East-West Center in Hawaii.
China’s anti-ship missile system also highlights a fundamental disagreement between China and the United States and Japan on regional missile defense, he said.
The U.S. and Japan contend its joint missile defense program enhances regional security and is not aimed at China, despite U.S. reports highlighting the concern China’s growing missile program presents. China criticizes the system for unduly shifting the balance of military power in the region.
The U.S.-led missile defense system in Asia neutralizes China’s ability to use nuclear weapons, Roy said. “It gives them a big reason to do a lot more” with conventional weapons systems, he said.
China called Japan’s recent announcement to beef up missile defense irresponsible, according to The London Telegraph.
“China will have no choice but to respond by enhancing its own capabilities,” said Jiang Yu, China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, the newspaper reported earlier this month."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
It is quite possible that the Chinese could provide enough problems for the U.S. Navy to effectively keep them from Taiwan long enough to launch a successful invasion.
This article from December 2010
The Chinese have made significant progress on a missile system designed to sink a moving aircraft carrier from nearly 2,000 miles away, according to the top U.S. commander in the Pacific.
China’s anti-ship missile system has reached the rough equivalent of what the U.S. military terms as “initial operational capability,” Adm. Robert Willard, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, said in an interview with Japan’s Asahi newspaper Tuesday.
At the heart of the system is the Dong Feng 21D, a mobile, land-based missile that is projected to strike a carrier from between 1,200 and 1,800 miles, depending on its payload and other factors.
Willard said that the “component parts of the anti-ship ballistic missile have been developed and tested,” according to Asahi.
The missile has not yet been flight-tested over water, Willard acknowledged.
The Defense Department broadly defines initial operational capability as when a unit has the ability to employ and maintain a weapon it has received, although it may still require refinement before reaching “full operational capability” and wide distribution, according to the Defense Acquisition University in Fort Belvoir, Va.
Nevertheless, if China has mastered the complexities of striking a moving ship with a ballistic missile, it would be the only country to possess such a weapon. The United States relies on other weapon systems to attack ships.
Willard’s revelation about the system adds to growing concerns in the United States and Japan about China’s rapidly modernizing military and its increasingly aggressive actions in the Pacific.
Reports of Chinese naval activity in international waters near Okinawa, a diplomatic row between Japan and China over an island chain claimed by both countries and a contentious U.S. arms sale to Taiwan this year have increased tension in the region. In its National Defense Program Guideline released Dec. 17, Japan called China’s growing military and its lack of transparency as “a matter of concern for the region and the international community.”
China, meanwhile, claims that its military rise is defensive in nature and not aimed at any country in particular.
However, Willard said, combined with China’s air and naval advancements and power projections in the region, the Dong Feng 21D signals China’s move to expand its capability of denying access to regional waters.
China’s priorities reflect obvious future aspirations to become a “global military,” Willard said.
For now, their focus is on “what they term their near seas — the Bohai, Yellow Sea, South China Sea, East China Sea,” Willard said.
China still considers Taiwan, located in the East China Sea across the Taiwan Strait, as its sovereign territory, despite its split from the mainland government in 1949.
During past security crises in the South China Sea, Beijing has launched missiles and staged amphibious assault exercises near Taiwan. It did so most notably in 1996, after it appeared that a candidate favoring Taiwan independence would win.
In response, the United States sent two aircraft carrier groups to the Taiwan Strait, after which China ceased its military escalation. The U.S. has dispatched an aircraft carrier near the Taiwan Strait during every successive presidential election in Taiwan.
An active Dong Feng 21D missile arsenal would complicate that strategy.
“The strongest argument for obtaining (the anti-ship missile) capability is keeping the U.S. Navy from intervening in Taiwan,” said Denny Roy, a senior fellow at the East-West Center in Hawaii.
China’s anti-ship missile system also highlights a fundamental disagreement between China and the United States and Japan on regional missile defense, he said.
The U.S. and Japan contend its joint missile defense program enhances regional security and is not aimed at China, despite U.S. reports highlighting the concern China’s growing missile program presents. China criticizes the system for unduly shifting the balance of military power in the region.
The U.S.-led missile defense system in Asia neutralizes China’s ability to use nuclear weapons, Roy said. “It gives them a big reason to do a lot more” with conventional weapons systems, he said.
China called Japan’s recent announcement to beef up missile defense irresponsible, according to The London Telegraph.
“China will have no choice but to respond by enhancing its own capabilities,” said Jiang Yu, China’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, the newspaper reported earlier this month."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by Docfeelgood View PostI see China invading N Korea and overthrowing the government, then putting a puppet regime in that they have better control over."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostIs Taiwan getting the F-35? If Taiwan gets stealth fighters it would make it very hard for China with its current tech to fight them.
The next generation stealth fighter under development by the Chinese military could rival America's best fighters in speed, stealth and lethality, according to a new private report.
Details on the Chinese J-20 fighter are scant as the project has been developed under extreme secrecy, but an analysis conducted by the conservative Washington D.C.-based defense policy think tank The Jamestown Foundation based on the little publicly available information concluded that the fighter "will be a high performance stealth aircraft, arguably capable of competing in most cardinal performance parameters... with the United States F-22A Raptor, and superior in most if not all cardinal performance parameters against the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter."
..."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by PLATO View PostMaybe...maybe. But is it possible they already have the puppet they desire?
China now has to worry about S Korea and Japan joining the nuclear club as a deterrent to N Korea.
Also...
The last thing China wants is 15 million starving N Koreans swarming over the border into China. It would be a humanitarian disaster of historical proportion.Last edited by Docfeelgood; April 9, 2013, 18:31.
Comment
Comment