Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top marginal tax rate in US now ~65%

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • giblets
    replied
    Hiring employees... isn't that deducted as a business expense?

    Leave a comment:


  • Ogie Oglethorpe
    replied
    Originally posted by Asher View Post
    What's 35% of a million dollars a year?
    Missed opportunity to hire 6 employees?

    Leave a comment:


  • MrFun
    replied
    Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
    I truly don't understand what point you're trying to make here.

    Leave a comment:


  • Asher
    replied
    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
    You dream of only having 35% of your income for your own use?
    What's 35% of a million dollars a year?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tupac Shakur
    replied
    Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
    You can always trust brainless partisans like fun to miss the point.

    The US welfare state is doomed when children like yourself refuse to acknowledge simple mathematics and focus on political theater.
    QFT

    Leave a comment:


  • MichaeltheGreat
    replied
    Originally posted by dannubis View Post
    Marginal income, if you are being intellectually honest.
    Marginal income from ordinary income, excluding capital gains not taxed as ordinary income.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ogie Oglethorpe
    replied
    Originally posted by gribbler View Post
    Why are personal exemptions and itemized deductions being phased out? I thought people were talking about capping them?

    edit: I didn't know about personal exemption phaseouts but it doesn't seem like it would make a very big difference.
    Regardless of exemptions allowed in current law

    Three letters from post 24 - AMT.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aeson
    replied
    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
    You dream of only having 35% of your income for your own use?
    Guy is married, so has roughly 0% of his own income for his own use![/AlBundy]

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    That wouldn't be any fun.

    Leave a comment:


  • kentonio
    replied
    Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
    Perhaps you need to re-evaluate what I've been saying here. Especially the parts where I explicitly explained how little my taxes were impacted by this...
    Perhaps, but then I'd need to stop being snarky and flippant.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeH
    replied
    Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
    It drops from 12 to 2 per cent at around the 45k mark. And the lower limit is the same as the personal allowance (allocated weekly,fortnightly or monthly). Or are you talking about something else?
    You know, I thought it was something like that, then checked the govenment website and it convinced me I was wrong. Nice that their site is so clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • KrazyHorse
    replied
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
    How about the point that if you can save a years income in just three years while simultaneously living a wealthy lifestyle, that you have no real ground to stand on when you start *****ing about your taxes going up slightly?
    Perhaps you need to re-evaluate what I've been saying here. Especially the parts where I explicitly explained how little my taxes were impacted by this...

    Leave a comment:


  • Kidlicious
    replied
    Originally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
    I was at around 43% effective tax rate last year (2011). Probably closer to 38% this year (2012) and 40-41% for 2013.

    Edit: numbers based around the following simplifying assumptions

    Count federal, state and local income tax
    Count payroll taxes on both sides (employer and employee)
    Do not count imputed future taxes on max contribution to 401k and employer contributions
    As income do not count contributions to 401k and employer contributions
    Count as income employer side of payroll taxes
    Count as income capital losses realized for tax purposes
    Do not count as income unrealized capital gains
    Do count as income dividends
    The average effective tax rate isn't that high, and it isn't typical for a married couple, earning what you say, to pay 60% effective tax. If they are super rich they pay around 50%.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dauphin
    replied
    Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
    You dream of only having 35% of your income for your own use?
    Edit - misread.
    Last edited by Dauphin; January 3, 2013, 09:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Kenobi
    replied
    How about the point that if you can save a years income in just three years while simultaneously living a wealthy lifestyle, that you have no real ground to stand on when you start *****ing about your taxes going up slightly?
    Damn him for having the temerity to actually get ahead of the game.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X