Originally posted by DaShi
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
benghazi conspiracy = birthers
Collapse
X
-
I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
-
Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostWhat makes the UK and Red Cross so prescient?“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
In most cases the obvious answer, which is in plain sight, is the right oneLast edited by Alexander's Horse; November 18, 2012, 03:35.Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostThis thread is idiotic. The controversy is over the fact that for weeks the President insisted that the attack was over some video, and then proceeded to have the man who made the video that nobody watched and nobody cared about arrested on trumped up charges! This is despite the fact that it was obvious to everyone else that it was a terrorist attack. And that multiple organs of the government knew that it was a terrorist attack and possibly knew about it ahead of time. Considering that calling it a terrorist attack doesn't fit with the administration's everyone-hates-us-and-it's-our-fault worldview, and also that it doesn't mesh well with saying Obama has been a hard-charging foreign policy success, there are multiple unseemly explanations for the lack of transparency from the administration.
In many other arab countries there WERE actually protests over the movie, most of which were rather peaceful.
The most likely scenario in my mind is that most of the protesters in Libya were actually protesting over the movie and that a group of terrorist used this a cover-up to burn the Embassy and murder the staff.
While that still leaves concerns about what exactly the administration was saying as opposed to what they knew, I don't think it's fair to say that when they were claiming it was about the movie, it was complete BS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zevico View PostIslamists and others in the Middle East feel a strong, grounded animosity towards the United States that is not going to go away whatever policy the United States adopts, no matter how understanding and empathetic their leadership may be. The reason being that the United States is both a powerful nation and a symbol of democratic values that are antithetical to theirs. As Bush it: "they hate us for our freedom."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lul Thyme View PostIt seems to me the truth is somewhere in between.
In many other arab countries there WERE actually protests over the movie, most of which were rather peaceful.
The most likely scenario in my mind is that most of the protesters in Libya were actually protesting over the movie and that a group of terrorist used this a cover-up to burn the Embassy and murder the staff.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
The officials on the call did not respond directly to allegations made by Nordstrom and Wood that the State Department rejected repeated requests to increase security in Libya, but they defended the security in Benghazi and said that Stevens was traveling with five diplomatic security agents, two more than his regular contingent of three, in light of the increased threat environment.
"There had been no attacks like that anywhere in Libya in the time that we had been there. So it was unprecedented," the official said. "In fact, there hasn't been an attack like that in recent diplomatic history."“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
The officials on the call did not respond directly to allegations made by Nordstrom and Wood that the State Department rejected repeated requests to increase security in Libya, but they defended the security in Benghazi and said that Stevens was traveling with five diplomatic security agents, two more than his regular contingent of three, in light of the increased threat environment.
"There had been no attacks like that anywhere in Libya in the time that we had been there. So it was unprecedented," the official said. "In fact, there hasn't been an attack like that in recent diplomatic history."“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
So are you agreeing with point 1 I raised? After all it was the deteriorating situation in Benghazi that encouraged the UK and Red Cross to close their facilities in that city because they felt they couldn't secure them in an adequate fashion.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
No, that would be incredibly stupid reasoning, because it clearly supports that they reasonably did not predict the event. Pure hindsight now.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaShi View PostNo, that would be incredibly stupid reasoning, because it clearly supports that they reasonably did not predict the event. Pure hindsight now.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostThis thread is idiotic. The controversy is over the fact that for weeks the President insisted that the attack was over some video, and then proceeded to have the man who made the video that nobody watched and nobody cared about arrested on trumped up charges! This is despite the fact that it was obvious to everyone else that it was a terrorist attack. And that multiple organs of the government knew that it was a terrorist attack and possibly knew about it ahead of time. Considering that calling it a terrorist attack doesn't fit with the administration's everyone-hates-us-and-it's-our-fault worldview, and also that it doesn't mesh well with saying Obama has been a hard-charging foreign policy success, there are multiple unseemly explanations for the lack of transparency from the administration.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostUh, yeah, I suppose an American ambassador in an American Embassy is killed every day, Sava.
Republicans are responsible for more American deaths in the last 12 years than Al Qaeda.
They are working hard to destroy the American economy and kill as many Americans as possible.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostBelieving the Admin was dangerously incompetent in this issue doesn't require a conspiracy.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
Comment