Originally posted by regexcellent
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why's my absentee ballot blank?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostElected judges have always seemed like a weird idea, but then again we don't have them over here. Don't you have problems with judges feeling they need to make politically wise judgements?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostYes, absolutely. In Georgia you get judges putting out TV ads promising that they will apply christian values. No thank you. Virginia does it RIGHT. Judges are appointed by the governor and approved by the legislature, and serve long (10+) year terms.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostDidn't your supreme court used to actually be part of the legislature? The House of Lords?
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhy'd you change that, by the way?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostSo you are automatically a partisan because there aren't any democrats on the ballot you like?
I swear, your style of argument gets more Kenobi-like with each passing day.
Oh, and...
Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostI've voted straight ticket in every election. Why would I vote for an opposing ideology?Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostThe Law Lords, yes. Bear in mind that they were a non-elected system also. I don't know much about how the system worked, but I believe they were appointed by existing members of the judiciary. Could be wrong though.
Which part?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhat was the problem with the Law Lords? Why'd you switch them to being a separate supreme court? I'm not criticizing the decision--I just don't understand the reasoning.
Comment
-
That seems to defeat the entire purpose of the Lords. Why not just get rid of the House of Lords if you're going to make it elected?
If you're going to keep the Lords, what you may as well do is just sort of turn it into a really big appointed advisory body of experts from industry and science and stuff to help with legislation. But isn't that basically what it is right now, plus some people from the Church of England and a handful of your wonderfully anachronistic hereditary aristocracy?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
The decision has been pretty much reached (and which I disagree with as it happens) that an elected or at least majority elected second chamber is preferable to an unelected one. I see the argument for it, but I think having an unelected revisionary upper chamber has actually served us very well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThat seems to defeat the entire purpose of the Lords. Why not just get rid of the House of Lords if you're going to make it elected?
If you're going to keep the Lords, what you may as well do is just sort of turn it into a really big appointed advisory body of experts from industry and science and stuff to help with legislation. But isn't that basically what it is right now, plus some people from the Church of England and a handful of your wonderfully anachronistic hereditary aristocracy?"I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
Comment