Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Nietzsche
Collapse
X
-
Good distinction. I think Nietzche would say that the herd follows what it believes (what it is told) is truth (objective). The individual knows what is true in his heart.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostThat's a terrible analysis. Rand is an Objectivist. She believes in what she does because she believes that it is true, and that truth can be apprehended and understood. Neitzsche on the other hand believes just the opposite. He believes there's no such thing as objective truth and that amoral brutality is the consequence of this presupposition.Last edited by Kidlicious; October 25, 2012, 07:54.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
What he was saying is that the masses can't just make up some moral system, or that the moral system that they came up with wouldn't be worth a hill of beans, because the masses are immoral.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostOne of the things he's really good at is showing that a lot of morality was based on a Judeo-Christian basis and thus any system which wanted to purge the religious basis would have to come up with an entirely no moral order with a new basis because you can't just take out the Christianity out of a moral system based on Christian morality - it would stop making sense.Last edited by Kidlicious; October 25, 2012, 07:33.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Will to power?Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostQuite the contrary - he's well deserving of his reputation and standing as one of the most prominent philosophers ever. He's pretty much spot on.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
True. Their ideal societies would be vastly different. On a superficial level you can say they are both "amoral brutality", but it'd be like saying there is only a cosmetic difference between, say, liberal Protestantism and the Taliban.Originally posted by Ben Kenobi View PostThat's a terrible analysis. Rand is an Objectivist. She believes in what she does because she believes that it is true, and that truth can be apprehended and understood. Neitzsche on the other hand believes just the opposite. He believes there's no such thing as objective truth and that amoral brutality is the consequence of this presupposition.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
Some of his work was edited after his death by his antisemitic sister, if I remember correctly. Thus leading to the unfounded connections between Nietzsche's thought and the later 'philosophy' behind Nazism.Originally posted by Elok View PostDo any of y'all know what he was talking about?
I don't. From what I can make out, he sounds like Ayn Rand, only less coherent and more poetic. Right-brain Rand.
As I'm thinking Nietzsche thoughts, I suddenly recalled the taciturn son in 'Little Miss Sunshine' had quite a good rendition of Nietzsche painted on a sheet, hanging on his bedroom wall.
And a t-shirt saying 'Jesus Was Wrong' in Gothic script, which Freddy N. might have found wryly amusing.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
No it dunt. But when posh English types say 'can't' sometimes it does- according to Ruby Wax:Originally posted by Uncle Sparky View PostKant pronounced correctly, rhymes with punt.
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
I wasn't aware that Nietzsche believed there was an "ideal society." Indeed, I imagine the simple mention of the phrase would send him into a frenzy of poetic excoriation. I don't mean to say that the two are identical; their messages are tailored for different audiences, and they get there from different directions. But certainly Nietzsche was a strong influence on the young Rand, before she ditched him for being insufficiently "rational."Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostTrue. Their ideal societies would be vastly different. On a superficial level you can say they are both "amoral brutality", but it'd be like saying there is only a cosmetic difference between, say, liberal Protestantism and the Taliban.
Oh, I know he wasn't a Nazi. I've read a small but representative amount of his unedited writings for school--genealogy of morals, prologue to Zarathustra, etc. I have a copy of Kaufmann's Portable Nietzsche in the library upstairs, which I make an effort to read from time to time. A very gifted writer, for all that trying to understand him is like swimming through mud.Originally posted by molly bloom View PostSome of his work was edited after his death by his antisemitic sister, if I remember correctly. Thus leading to the unfounded connections between Nietzsche's thought and the later 'philosophy' behind Nazism.
As I'm thinking Nietzsche thoughts, I suddenly recalled the taciturn son in 'Little Miss Sunshine' had quite a good rendition of Nietzsche painted on a sheet, hanging on his bedroom wall.
And a t-shirt saying 'Jesus Was Wrong' in Gothic script, which Freddy N. might have found wryly amusing.
And Little Miss Sunshine was awesome.
Comment
ACK!
Comment