Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A study in failure: Benghazi
Collapse
X
-
Did they consider the Ambassador begging for more security simply to be amusing e-mails to read at work?I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
-
That's not what the person who denied the request said.Originally posted by gribbler View PostFor all I know, they could have limited resources and can't satisfy every request people make.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Let's assume this to be true for a moment Berz. If he said it was a terrorist attack then, why was the narrative for over a week afterward from the Admin about a video?Originally posted by Berzerker View Postthat appears to be the set up for Carney and Rice, not Benghazi - didn't Obama refer to the terrorist attack the next day?I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Our trillion dollar defense budget limits our ability to provide security for ambassador's in hostile regions? Only partisan hacks would make that sort of claim.Originally posted by gribbler View PostFor all I know, they could have limited resources and can't satisfy every request people make.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
I agree the administration seemed more concerned with the protests than that specific attack, at least publicly... But I can understand why they'd be concerned, Benghazi already happened and these protests were growing. Its clear from the OP Wallace was asking Carney and Rice about the worldwide protests, not Benghazi.
Comment
-
I don't think our seven hundred billion dollar defense budget is devoted to embassy security. There's a specific appropriation for embassy security which, if I'm not mistaken, was cut recently.Originally posted by Felch View PostOur trillion dollar defense budget limits our ability to provide security for ambassador's in hostile regions? Only partisan hacks would make that sort of claim.
Comment
-

Any excuse to stick to your partisan hackery. 700 billion is just what DoD admits to spending. We spend hundreds of billions more on defense through the State Department, Veterans Affairs, Department of Energy, and several other avenues including black budgets. The fact is that resources are perfectly sufficient to provide embassy security. The embassy security appropriation that you're referring to is for construction and maintenance, and it was still over a billion and a half dollars for FY 2013.
The fact is, if the President wanted to deploy marines or additional State Department security, he could have. Instead the administration ignored intelligence that didn't fit in with their "Al Qaeda is beaten" rhetoric.John Brown did nothing wrong.
Comment
-
Oh, so the story is that supposedly the embassy obviously needed more security, but Obama decided not to because it went against his "Al Qaeda is beaten" rhetoric, thereby enabling "Al Qaeda" in Libya to attack the embassy and make it look like Al Qaeda isn't getting beaten? And he let this happen because embassy security didn't fit with his rhetoric?Originally posted by Felch View Post
Any excuse to stick to your partisan hackery. 700 billion is just what DoD admits to spending. We spend hundreds of billions more on defense through the State Department, Veterans Affairs, Department of Energy, and several other avenues including black budgets. The fact is that resources are perfectly sufficient to provide embassy security. The embassy security appropriation that you're referring to is for construction and maintenance, and it was still over a billion and a half dollars for FY 2013.
The fact is, if the President wanted to deploy marines or additional State Department security, he could have. Instead the administration ignored intelligence that didn't fit in with their "Al Qaeda is beaten" rhetoric.
Comment
-
In this case even some horses and bayonets would have been helpful.Originally posted by Asher View PostEvery embassy should have a fleet of F-22s to defend it."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
Maybe some binders to organize the email printouts."Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
Comment