I'll just put this here...

[DinoDoc]

All of my problems with Romney ...

Are you the Obama campaign?

[Tupac Shakur]

Zevico, most people by now realize that Obama's record sucks. That should be obvious given his campaign's obsession with making Romney look like Satan rather than running on their record. The case that needs to be made is that Romney is a better choice.

QFT

[Boris Godunov]

The problem is that in all matters foreign and domestic, Romney has proven he is not the better choice. He can't even manage a campaign competently, so the notion he'd do any better as President is about as unfounded as it gets.

[a.kitman]

isnt mitt obama but just unlikable?

[Tupac Shakur]

The problem is that in all matters foreign and domestic, Romney has proven he is not the better choice. He can't even manage a campaign competently, so the notion he'd do any better as President is about as unfounded as it gets.

You mean the incompetent campaign that has raised more money than the incumbent President?

Romney Gains Huge Cash Advantage Over Obama

[kentonio]

Spending vast sums of money and then getting your ass handed to you is indeed pretty incompetent.

[Boris Godunov]

You mean the incompetent campaign that has raised more money than the incumbent President?

Romney Gains Huge Cash Advantage Over Obama

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

Now also keep in mind that Obama outraised Romney in August and likely will have again in September.

[Boris Godunov]

Spending vast sums of money and then getting your ass handed to you is indeed pretty incompetent.

And that's true, too.

Romney has raised his vast sums by tapping rich donors who max out their contributions. In contrast, most of Obama's money is from $200 or less donors. His campaign is approaching a record 10 million donors.

As the stench of impending defeat clings ever more ominously around Romney, his donations are going to start drying up as the GOP decides to move funds to salvage Senate and House races.

[Hauldren Collider]

That's a myth. Obama's donors trend only slightly more towards small donations than Romney's. Obama just taps a different group of rich people--celebrities.

[DinoDoc]

That's a myth. Obama's donors trend only slightly more towards small donations than Romney's. Obama just taps a different group of rich people--celebrities.

It's also irrelevant. If you actually want to make a point regarding Boris's post, it would be that Obama has shown that skill at campaigning has shown us all that it doesn't translate well to the skill set of governing given the record we have.

[kentonio]

That's a myth. Obama's donors trend only slightly more towards small donations than Romney's. Obama just taps a different group of rich people--celebrities.

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/campaign-finance

Those darn lying mythmakers at the NYT.

Seriously dude, do you ever actually check any of these bull**** right wing talking points, or do you just have faith in FOX?

[DaShi]

It's also irrelevant. If you actually want to make a point regarding Boris's post, it would be that Obama has shown that skill at campaigning has shown us all that it doesn't translate well to the skill set of governing given the record we have.

The whole point was retarded to begin with. No one should be arguing it.

[giblets]

That's a myth. Obama's donors trend only slightly more towards small donations than Romney's. Obama just taps a different group of rich people--celebrities.

WHAT? Over half of Obama's donors donated less than $200 while only 21% of Romney's donor did so.

[DaShi]

Beyonce and Jay-Z hosted a dinner for him and wouldn't shut up about it.

[Tupac Shakur]

There are really only two things that matter when looking at the effectiveness of a campaign: funds raised and get-out-the-vote organization created. By all accounts, Romney is doing better at the former and Obama is doing better at the latter. Both campaigns seem to know what they're doing, unlike in 2008.