Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The National School Lunch Policy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Because if there's one thing Americans really need, it's larger portions.
    The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

    Comment


    • #47
      Amen.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #48
        Only in America would healthy food be a bad thing because a black woman supports it...actually there are probably a lot of other countries that would do the same thing.
        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
        "Capitalism ho!"

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
          Kids aren't getting any smarter, unfortunately.
          Singularly close to the truth
          In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

          Comment


          • #50
            In this case, I wish we would copy the French. Here is a sample school menu from Paris:
            “It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”

            ― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

            Comment


            • #51
              The underlying premise of a school lunch "policy" is that obesity will be "solved" if one meal a day is prescribed by federal bureaucrats who know better than parents.

              If one, why not all three? No wonder this policy is a failure. It doesn't go far enough to do anything, and if it did, well the US may as well be a police state if it was really going to start prescribing what kids have to eat for every meal.

              The problem of obesity isn't going to be solved with national school lunches but with parents that ensure their kids eat well and acquire healthy habits. No more and no less. That the US Congress has bought into the notion of a federal school lunch policy is simply unreal. What a sheer waste of public resources.
              "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

              Comment


              • #52
                Waste of public resources? They were already providing lunches at schools, they just changed it to make it healthier.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Yes, and that's the problem with the federal government providing these things. The first thing it does is "okay, let's take something states and localities do, and help them do it. We're not influencing them at all."

                  Then later it says "We're paying for this program, so now we get to decide how it's run."

                  That's why it's unnaceptable.

                  What's healthy for one child isn't necessarily what's healthy for another. The feds are fond of one-size-fits-all non-solutions to non-problems. I don't trust the judgment of the federal government one iota, especially not over your average parent, especially considering the blowhards in Washington have no direct reason to be interested in what happens to any individual child.

                  Comment


                  • #54


                    Some of the posts in this thread are just ****ing unreal.
                    "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                    "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      regX, what's wrong about the government governing?
                      In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Oncle Boris View Post
                        regX, what's wrong about the government governing?
                        Because the price went up and the students get less food.
                        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Oncle Boris View Post
                          regX, what's wrong about the government governing?
                          It's bad at it.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by gribbler View Post
                            Waste of public resources? They were already providing lunches at schools, they just changed it to make it healthier.
                            The federal government, entrusted with the future of hundreds of millions of people, is now concerning itself with the contents of a child's lunch box.

                            Are you seriously telling me you're voting for a congressman because of the contents of your child's lunch? Is that the factor that weighs heavily in your mind when you think of a federal congressman? The Democrats like peas but the Republicans prefer cheddar?
                            "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Zevico View Post
                              The federal government, entrusted with the future of hundreds of millions of people, is now concerning itself with the contents of a child's lunch box.

                              Are you seriously telling me you're voting for a congressman because of the contents of your child's lunch? Is that the factor that weighs heavily in your mind when you think of a federal congressman? The Democrats like peas but the Republicans prefer cheddar?
                              Has it occurred to you that Congress doesn't pass just one bill a year? And if Republicans want to give schoolchildren diabetes by paying for unhealthy lunches, that certainly doesn't make me more willing to vote for them.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Zevico View Post
                                The underlying premise of a school lunch "policy" is that obesity will be "solved" if one meal a day is prescribed by federal bureaucrats who know better than parents.
                                You're obviously clueless because that isn't the "premise" at all. The idea is much like the first rule for doctors "first do no harm"; school lunches in this country used to be a doctor's worst nightmare wrt national nutrition and they're still pretty damn bad but now they're only bad instead of worst imaginable. That has nothing to do with your imaginary bureaucrats trying to tell parents what to do and everything to do with making sure the one meal per day schools are responsible for is balanced and nutritious.
                                Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X