Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mars rover Curiosity lands on surface of Red Planet

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    The point that the comic was making was that the "total output" is a completely meaningless measure of scientific achievement. You can pump out as many papers as you like, but if none of them are actually breakthroughs, who gives a ****?
    Who do you think is writing these papers exactly?

    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    There is only one country whose research could ever hope to rival the United States, and that's Japan.
    Based on what exactly? More importantly what in gods name do you base 'could ever' on? You've been a superpower for less than 70 years, and you're already convinced that no other country could compete? Other than Japan?!

    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    Also launching commercial satellites is not a scientific endeavor, it's free riding on America continually pushing out the state of the art. America leads, Europe follows.
    Interesting theory, but didn't you basically steal your rocket technology from Germany and develop it with German scientists? Didn't you actually just free ride on Nazi Germany in effect?

    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    While France and Russia have been launching satellites, the US has been sending out deep-space probes and building space stations.
    That's interesting, what space stations have you built since Skylab back in the 70's? Would you be talking about the International Space Station (ISS)?

    Funnily enough though, China did launch one themselves just last year.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
      Uh... Mir, ISS, and Salyut...?

      Edit: And Venera
      ISS is NASA. Other countries may have built some of the modules on the ground but NASA did almost all the construction.
      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
      ){ :|:& };:

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
        There is only one country whose research could ever hope to rival the United States, and that's Japan.
        Makes sense. Everyone who doesn't live in those two countries is a ******.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by gribbler View Post
          Makes sense. Everyone who doesn't live in those two countries is a ******.
          I didn't phrase it quite right, it's difficult to type on a phone. What I meant was, at the moment, the only country whose real research output rivals the US is Japan.
          If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
          ){ :|:& };:

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
            ISS is NASA. Other countries may have built some of the modules on the ground but NASA did almost all the construction.
            The first component of the ISS was built and launched by Russia. The difference between Russian and American components is that the Russian components didn't need astronauts (or cosmonauts) to install them.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
              China has something like four times the population of the United States. Until their scientific productivity is more than that, you can't really make any claims about the quality of their science education compared to ours.
              That's the bizarre thing. China has like ten times as many people as Japan, but he's convinced that Japan is somehow destined to be a bigger contributor to the sum total of human knowledge than China...?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Lorizael View Post
                The first component of the ISS was built and launched by Russia. The difference between Russian and American components is that the Russian components didn't need astronauts (or cosmonauts) to install them.
                Very little of the station ended up being built by Russia, however, even if that was initially the plan.
                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                ){ :|:& };:

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                  I didn't phrase it quite right, it's difficult to type on a phone. What I meant was, at the moment, the only country whose real research output rivals the US is Japan.
                  Yeah, you really did phrase it poorly. When you said "only one country could ever hope to rival the US" it certainly seemed like a prediction.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                    Very little of the station ended up being built by Russia, however, even if that was initially the plan.
                    What do you mean 'very little'? Loads of it is Russian, the biggest module is Japanese and the ESA made at least one of the modules.

                    Btw, you are aware that the US can't even get to the ISS any more without hitch-hiking with the Russians?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                      What do you mean 'very little'? Loads of it is Russian, the biggest module is Japanese and the ESA made at least one of the modules.
                      Only a couple of the early modules are Russian and the US ended up paying for about half of it anyway, since they couldn't afford it. And like I said, the ESA and Japan built modules on the ground but they were launched and built by the US. The solar panels, junction modules and truss system were also all US-built.
                      Btw, you are aware that the US can't even get to the ISS any more without hitch-hiking with the Russians?
                      Yes, unfortunate . However, by the end of next year that should be fixed with the SpaceX Dragon.
                      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                      ){ :|:& };:

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                        Very little of the station ended up being built by Russia, however, even if that was initially the plan.
                        Of the 15 pressurized modules, 5 were built by Russia, 5 by Europe, 3 by the US, and 2 by Japan. All the Russian components were launched by Russia, and all the rest were launched by the US.
                        Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                        "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          Yes, unfortunate . However, by the end of next year that should be fixed with the SpaceX Dragon.
                          So now you can rely on a private company instead of having to rely on the Russians? That certainly does appear to be the new American way.

                          I'm curious what you're going to do when private companies like Space X decide to do things like sell their technology to the Chinese government or just start providing services to countries that America dislike.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            So what's the big deal about this landing? It's not unprecedented - we have landed a rover on Mars before.
                            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              The US holds the cutting edge, but is severely lacking in follow-through due to underfunding of our space program.
                              No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                                So what's the big deal about this landing? It's not unprecedented - we have landed a rover on Mars before.
                                Not like this. Never like this. This is the dropship scene from Aliens.
                                No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X