No, its 1965 or later.  It's still silly, either way.
							
						
					Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Chinese teenager 'kills eight in knife attack
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I find most of your posts to be that way. Yet you try to pass them off as poignant.Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostNo, its 1965 or later. It's still silly, either way. “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.” “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
 "Capitalism ho!"
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Umm because both are STILL wildly popular.Originally posted by Dauphin View PostIf British culture gets no credit if it dates from 1965 or before, then why does Coca-Cola or Mickey Mouse, which also predate 1965?
 
 I don't think 10 year olds in Gambia have or will ever have any interest in the Beatles or prince Albert in a can or whatever the British produced."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
 "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 This is the first smart thing you've said this whole thread.Originally posted by kentonio View PostYou should probably protest about this. You have the right to bear arms goddamn it! What are you supposed to do if King George comes back to reclaim his colonies or those bastids in Washington come to steal your freedoms?
 
 If the Feds want to restrict my right to bear doomsday devices, they should amend the Constitution, not just ignore it.John Brown did nothing wrong.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 They would be far too busy dreaming of a trip to Disneyworld, or wondering when Madonna would sweep in to adopt them?Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostUmm because both are STILL wildly popular.
 
 I don't think 10 year olds in Gambia have or will ever have any interest in the Beatles or prince Albert in a can or whatever the British produced.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Umm have you heard about a little thing called HARRY POTTER?Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostI'm sorry because the whole world doesn't listen to Michael Jackson, love Mickey Mouse, and drink coca-cola. I think I dreamt that 
 
 The British haven't been culturally relevant since about 1965 or whenever the Beatles were out. And it took Americans hopping on their bandwagon for their meteoric rise to even happen.
 Actually, just look at how many of the top grossing films in recent years were based on British books (Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, etc.):
 
 
 Not culturally relevant?  
 Comment
 
							
						 
	
Comment