Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Republicans really do hate gay people
Collapse
X
-
This is a non point. If you choose A, B can't be chosen. AND? AND???Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostIt is, in fact, because ensuring a latina is nominated is the same as ensuring that no other kind of person is nominated."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Do you not see how this is identical to refusing to nominate someone because of some personal attribute?Originally posted by MRT144 View PostThis is a non point. If you choose A, B can't be chosen. AND? AND???
In Obama's case, he's refusing to nominate people who aren't latina.
In this case, they are refusing to nominate people who aren't straight.
The difference is we're supposed to feel sorry for the people who fall into set A and not supposed to feel sorry for people who fall into set B.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
So you agree that no Christian should be involved, then.Originally posted by Wiglaf View PostHow is this discrimination at all? No one wants an activist for anything, much less anal sex, sitting on the bench. Their job is to be impartial.
Activism goes both ways."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
You have no proof that Obama rejected all other potential appointees on the basis of them not being latinos. You are no better than someone who claims Obama won the election because of his skin color.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostIt is, in fact, because ensuring a latina is nominated is the same as ensuring that no other kind of person is nominated.
Comment
-
He didnt nominate her solely or even largely because she was latina. She had requisite experience to boot. And she was appointed by George H. Bush, so obviously she had some merit to warrant that. There's your difference you dolt. It's not like you're complaining about Roberts or Alito because he shared the same political views with Bush, so you fall back on this phony excuse of "Obama only did it for this reason". Stop being so full of ****, ****bird.Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostDo you not see how this is identical to refusing to nominate someone because of some personal attribute?
In Obama's case, he's refusing to nominate people who aren't latina.
In this case, they are refusing to nominate people who aren't straight.
The difference is we're supposed to feel sorry for the people who fall into set A and not supposed to feel sorry for people who fall into set B.
This guy has already received the blessing of a non political judicial body in being nominated and confirmed and yet politics and the underlying bigotry of the Republican Party."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Wouldn't that be a reason to nominate a hot lesbian and have cameras in the court?Originally posted by Kuciwalker View PostThe concern is that confirming this judge would lead to wanton gay orgies in courtrooms, impeding the swift application of justice.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
Comment