The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's resume our discussion about Harper and the oil lobby
Oerdin Asher & Co you are quoting from older sources.
I found articles in reputable sources from March 2012 saying 2 billion at most.
Where did you get your numbers? I can't find them anywhere.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Rarely has a stretch of seabed caused as much controversy as Old Harry
Old Harry whips gulf into a tempest
Nicolas Van Praet Feb 16, 2012 – 4:52 PM ET | Last Updated: Mar 30, 2012 2:21 PM ET
Rarely has a stretch of seabed caused as much controversy as Old Harry.
The 30 km-long site in the Gulf of St. Lawrence is perhaps the biggest untapped offshore oil-and-gas play in Eastern Canada, harnessing estimated resources of 2 billion barrels of oil and as much as 7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. It is also the epicentre of a monster battle for the future of the fish-rich waterway.
"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Oerdin Asher & Co you are quoting from older sources.
The 30-40b barrels announcement is from December 2011; it mentioned that they found a more porous extraction point. I understand it could be bollocks, but at least, the company is not publicly traded, which does somewhat limit suspicions.
Apparently they found conventional reserves too, not gigantic, but commercially viable.
Do you have a link I could read, please? That way we can get to the bottom of exactly what we are talking about.
Energy Magazine connects the leading energy executives of the world's largest brands. Our platform serves as a digital hub for connecting industry leaders, covering a wide range of services including media and advertising, events, research reports, demand generation, information, and data services.
With our comprehensive approach, we strive to provide timely and valuable insights into best practices, fostering innovation and collaboration within the energy community. Join us today to shape the future for generations to come.
Why are you so insistent, are you looking for equity investments?
Your link is about Old Harry, which has been known for quite a while.
Mine is about new discoveries under Anticosti Island.
I just used google translate on that page and it seems to be saying the 30-40 billion figure is the total amount of oil in the formation which would mean if they got the same recovery rate as the Monterrey shale (350 billion total with ~2.5 billion recoverable) you'd get ~285 million barrels conventional; with fracking maybe an order of magnitude more or about 2.8 billion on the upper limit. Not bad but a pretty darn small discovery. Still better than nothing though.
Could you please read the other link in #51 and tell us what you think about it?
There seemed to be a lot of fluff in that press release but I did notice this bit:
The company is in the heart of the Utica Shale gas discovery located in the St. Lawrence Lowlands and holds a significant land-package on the Anticosti Island where an independent report has provided their Best Estimate of the undiscovered shale oil initially-in-place ("OIIP") volume for the Macasty Shale on all five of Junex's permits on Anticosti Island at 12.2 billion barrels.
The 12.2 billion figure is initial oil in place or the total amount of hydrocarbons in the Utica shale deposit found in Quebec. That means the recoverable amount will be some tiny fraction of 12.2 billion (as I previously noticed the monterey shale has OIIP of ~350 billion with a conventional recovery amount of ~ 2.5 billion so we're talking a fraction of a fraction here). The Utica shale is also very deep located underneath the Marcelus shale (which is the big formation people are fracking in places like New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, etc...).
I expect recoverable gas deposits will be much, much higher than recoverable oil deposits as gas is a much smaller molecule than oil. Lately there has been a boom in Marcelus shale gas fracking in the Northeastern part of the US which has greatly expanded gas production but even with fracking oil extraction from the formation has been lack luster. The Utica lays below the Marcelus so it will be compacted even tighter with even less porosity & permeability in the formation. This will not be easy hydrocarbons to get.
Comment