Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why not regulate men's private parts too?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why not regulate men's private parts too?

    Insane Sex Laws Inspired by Republicans
    —By Hannah Levintova| Thu Mar. 8, 2012 3:00 AM PST
    43

    The Doctr/Flickr
    As Republican lawmakers have pushed ever more intrusive and expansive uterus-related legislation, some of their colleagues across the aisle have fired back with intentionally and equally ridiculous counterproposals. From mandatory rectal exams for guys seeking Viagra to prohibitions on sperm-stifling vasectomies, most of these male-only provisions have, unsurprisingly, flopped. But they've scored big as symbolic gestures, spotlighting the inherent sexism of laws that only regulate lady parts.

    Some of the tongue-in-cheek ideas introduced across the country:

    Delaware: By an 8 to 4 vote, the Wilmington, Delaware, city council recognized the personhood of semen because "each 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government."

    Virginia: As the state Senate debated requiring transvaginal ultrasounds for women seeking abortions, Sen. Janet Howell proposed mandating rectal exams and cardiac stress tests for men seeking erectile dysfunction meds. Her amendment failed by just two votes.

    Georgia: Responding to a Georgia house bill banning abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, Rep. Yasmin Neal wrote a bill outlawing most vasectomies because they leave "thousands of children…deprived of birth."

    Does Limbaugh think birth control pills work like Viagra? Plus: our handy calculator shows how much you'll spend on birth control over a lifetime.
    Ohio: A bill introduced by state Sen. Nina Turner would compel men to get psychological screenings before getting prescriptions for impotence meds. "We must advocate for the traditional family," Turner said, "and ensure that all men using PDE-5 inhibitors are healthy, stable, and educated about their options—including celibacy as a viable life choice."

    Illinois: State Rep. Kelly Cassidy proposed requiring men seeking Viagra to watch a video showing the treatment for persistent erections, an occasional side effect of the little blue pill. As she explained, "It's not a pretty procedure to watch."

    Missouri: Protesting the legislature's vote to reject Obama's contraception coverage mandate, nine female lawmakers cosponsored a bill restricting access to vasectomies except for men risking death or serious bodily harm. "In determining whether a vasectomy is necessary," the bill reads, "no regard shall be made to the desire of a man to father children, his economic situation, his age, the number of children he is currently responsible for, or any danger to his wife or partner in the event a child is conceived."

    Oklahoma: When a zygote-personhood bill came before the state Senate, Sen. Constance Johnson penned an amendment declaring that ejaculating anywhere outside a woman's vagina constitutes "an action against an unborn child." Bonus: Johnson also suggested that any man who impregnates a woman without her permission should pay a $25,000 fine, support the child until age 21, and get a vasectomy, "in the spirit of shared responsibility." In response to the same bill, state Sen. Jim Wilson proposed an amendment requiring the father of an unborn child to be financially responsible for its mother's health care, housing, transportation, and nourishment during pregnancy.

    Texas: Contesting a bill mandating sonograms before abortions, Rep. Harold Dutton unsuccessfully offered three amendments in a row. The first would have required the state to pay the college tuition of children born to women who decide against an abortion after seeing a required ultrasound image. The second would have subsidized the children's health care costs until age 18. When that failed, he lowered the age to 6. That didn't fly, either.
    http://motherjones.com/mojo/2012/03/...vasectomy-laws
    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

  • #2
    Gay.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • #3
      Totally gay.

      Comment


      • #4
        I know - it's so dumb to want to regulate women's private parts.
        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

        Comment


        • #5
          QUOTE Delaware: By an 8 to 4 vote, the Wilmington, Delaware, city council recognized the personhood of semen because "each 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government." ENDQUOTE

          Does this mean that masturbation is mass murder? A heinous crime against humanity?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Braindead View Post
            QUOTE Delaware: By an 8 to 4 vote, the Wilmington, Delaware, city council recognized the personhood of semen because "each 'egg person' and each 'sperm person' should be deemed equal in the eyes of the government." ENDQUOTE

            Does this mean that masturbation is mass murder? A heinous crime against humanity?
            Or is it merely emancipation?
            "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003

            Comment


            • #7
              Why don't I hear anti-contraceptive laws proponents advocate for laws against masturbation?
              A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't know of many people who want contraception to be outlawed so I can't answer that question.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                  Why don't I hear anti-contraceptive laws proponents advocate for laws against masturbation?
                  Because, in British English parlance, they're all a bunch of tossers anyway.
                  Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                  ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                    Why don't I hear anti-contraceptive laws proponents advocate for laws against masturbation?
                    Yeah, what laws are you referring to? The controversy so far is whether or not the first amendment protects the free exercise of religion.

                    Did the left fail high school biology or do they not understand the difference between haploid and diploid cells?
                    John Brown did nothing wrong.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      A person's religious freedom should never allow that person to deny another person's freedom or rights.
                      A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Felch View Post
                        Yeah, what laws are you referring to? The controversy so far is whether or not the first amendment protects the free exercise of religion.

                        Did the left fail high school biology or do they not understand the difference between haploid and diploid cells?
                        And Felch, could you please explain to the anti-contraceptive people (especially Catholics) the difference between haploid and diploid cells? I'm not the one that does not know the difference.
                        A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                          And Felch, could you please explain to the anti-contraceptive people (especially Catholics) the difference between haploid and diploid cells? I'm not the one that does not know the difference.
                          Catholics don't say that contraception is abortion. The Church says that it separates sex from the reproductive act. It's not considered as horrible as killing a human being though.

                          Originally posted by MrFun View Post
                          A person's religious freedom should never allow that person to deny another person's freedom or rights.
                          Your right to privacy (where the right to contraception comes from) doesn't give you the right to force other people to pay for your sexual activity. I have a right to bear arms. I don't have a right to make my employer give me a free gun or pay for my range fees. You have a right to your sexual privacy. But you don't have a right to free contraception.

                          Considering that free contraception lowers the likelihood of expensive births, it would make sense to me if insurance companies raised the rates of Catholic organizations that refuse to pay for contraception. I'd have no problem with that. That's part of the cost of freedom. I'm concerned by your flippant lack of respect for Constitutional protections. People don't have a right just to popular speech, or to only practice religions that the majority of people agree with. We have a right to free speech, and to freely practice religions, even if they seem out of touch or politically incorrect.
                          John Brown did nothing wrong.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Felch View Post
                            I'm concerned by your flippant lack of respect for Constitutional protections. People don't have a right just to popular speech, or to only practice religions that the majority of people agree with. We have a right to free speech, and to freely practice religions, even if they seem out of touch or politically incorrect.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'd be glad to support a law saying that old dudes should cover their wrinkly old schlongs in the locker room
                              <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X