Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Did the Sahara cause Black-white racism and affect how we view race?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThe north had geographic reasons for factories. At the time, the primary source of power was from rivers.
The huge agricultural plantations did make plenty of money but it doesn't lend itself to industrialization as the geography of the north did for reasons stated above.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostWho eviscerated Confederates?
Frankly, we weren't harsh enough. Should have occupied their asses til the 1960's. The moment Reconstruction ended, they started that Jim Crow BS.
Lost capital can be replaced relatively quickly after a war. It certainly didn't take that long for Japan to recover after its population was actually eviscerated in WWII.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Whoha View Postwhen the victor invests in such instead of imposing a horridly corrupt government on the vanquished, sure.
Comment
-
Remember. Southerners are always victims even when you give them free ****.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Benjamin Isaac published 'The Invention Of Racism In Classical Antiquity' a few years ago:
Pierre L. Van den Berghe, an American anthropologist, also gives a narrow description of racism: "It is important to stress that racism, unlike ethnocentrism, is not a universal phenomenon. Members of all human societies have a fairly good opinion of themselves, compared with members of other societies, but the good opinion is frequently based on his own creations. Only a few human groups have deemed themselves superior because of the contents of their gonads."42 This concept of racism has clearly been determined by its use in recent history, in the 1930s and 1940s, and Banton and Van den Berghe have formulated their definition to make it fit this particular historical situation. Their approach would make it futile to look for racism anywhere but in modern, western civilization. It assumes that there are forms of chauvinism, prejudice, and discrimination everywhere among humanity, but the term racism is here applied only to discrimination on the basis of presumed biological differences.
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
When the bronzes of Ife were discovered in the 19th Century, various ludicrous explanations were offered to console those who thought black Africans couldn't possibly possess the minds or skills required to conceive and create such astonishing art...
...and in earlier times, David Hume (1711-1776)
who had never been to Ife, wrote:
I am apt to suspect the Negroes, and in general all other species of men, to be naturally inferior to the whites. There never was any civilized nation of any other complection than white, nor even any individual eminent in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures among them, no arts, no sciences…Such a uniform and constant difference could not happen, in so many countries and ages, if nature had not made an original distinction between these breeds of men.
Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
I have to disagree somewhat with the notion that 'Othello' isn't about or concerned with Othello's race. We know that there were a number of Africans resident in London at the time Shakespeare was writing and acting ( even Henry VIII had an African trumpeter, John Blank) and that Elizabeth I had noticed their presence.
Iago:
Even now, now, very now, an old black ram
Is tupping your white ewe.
your daughter and the Moor are now making the beast with two backs.
To the gross clasps of a lascivious Moor
These Moors are changeable in their wills: fill thy purse with money: — the food
that to him now is as luscious as locusts, shall be
to him shortly as bitter as coloquintida. She must
change for youth: when she is sated with his body,
she will find the error of her choice:
I hate the Moor:
And it is thought abroad, that 'twixt my sheets
He has done my office:
And, noble signior,
If virtue no delighted beauty lack,
Your son-in-law is far more fair than black
the sooty bosom
Of such a thing as thou—to fear, not to delight.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
I said compared to even 1970 US.
A racist play in the early 16th century showed less racism than progressive productions of the 70s.
Conclusion: the extreme racism seen in the 18th, 19th, and 20th century was a result of the 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries.
I expect that it is a result of the enlightenment coupled with colonialism. Suddenly, for the europeans to be 'guilt free', the native peoples must be less than human. So now one group not of your tribe gets selected as less than human (the native peoples).
Before it was just standard 'not of your people' behavior, and you would see Irish or what have you treated with more distaste in the 16th century than the African.
JMLast edited by Jon Miller; February 28, 2012, 12:14.Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostThe "horribly corrupt government" did give grants for the construction of too many railroads but that's the opposite of "not investing in such". You haven't provided much evidence that the government actually stopped capital from being invested in areas where it would earn a high return in the South.
The Republicans did have the audacity to suppress Ku Klux Klan violence so that the black vote wouldn't get suppressed and Republican candidates would be competitive in elections. Outrageous.Last edited by Whoha; February 28, 2012, 15:15.
Comment
-
Part of that increase in spending is the result of an increase in revenue. In fact, I suggest you watch PBS's "Slavery by another name" documentary which can currently be watched for free online. It details how Southern states basically criminalized everything for blacks because they learned that even with slavery illegal convicts could be rented out to companies as laborers and the rent fees paid directly to the state. Convict rental fees became anything from 1/5th all the way up to half of the state revenue in several southern states so they'd literally arrest black men for nothing at all, trump something up, and then rent them out as convict laborers.
As an added bonus the Supreme Court said convicts could be striped of their right to vote (we still have this in effect) so Southern whites really did want to criminalize as many blacks as possible both to perminently remove the right to vote from them but also because selling their labor was so extremely profitable to the state.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Whoha View PostThe radical republicans kept their political enemies disenfranchised for as long as was possible."Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
"I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi
Comment
Comment