Originally posted by Dinner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fair is fair . . . Georgia Democrats propose an anti-vasectomy bill
Collapse
X
-
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostWell, yes, because said people have no brain activity due to their brains dying. The condition, in that case, is permanent. They're never going to do anything but sit, drool and stare. In most pregnancies, this is not the case, and I have no objection to abortions in the rare cases where it is.
The fact that the rapidly developing embryo may not yet meet requirements to be regarded as deserving of special protection is relevant, no matter how much you do not want it to be.
The simple fact is that it is legally and morally proper to terminate a human life under certain circumstances. Brain death is just one of them. The lack of a brain could be another.
My problem is that you're looking at the stage they're presently at in isolation, speculating on thoughts and feelings they might be having, and proposing that you should make those speculations the basis of law. Never mind the larger process, only their present state counts. Which is kinda like making it legal to waste somebody, provided s/he is asleep and therefore not totally conscious.
The circumstances of terminating a human life do matter in making it a moral or immoral and a legal or illegal act.
The complete lack of a brain of any sort, let alone activity in that brain does completely remove the possibility of thoughts and feelings, does it not?
You won't find any other than fertilization, which turns it from two distinct cells from two different people into a unified individual with its own identity. There's no bright line between one stage of pregnancy and another any more than there's a bright line between "baby" and "toddler." Yes, you can say what a baby is and what a toddler is, but you can't pinpoint one exact moment where it ceases to be the one and becomes the other, because growth is a continuous, gradual process in and out of the womb. The icky slimy little thing that looks like a bacterium isn't swapped out for the eight-months variant that looks like a wizened, but still vaguely cute, Roswell alien. They're the same critter.
Yes, but why? Because you're projecting thoughts and feelings onto a being which is unlikely to have either (at least, in any meaningful way--it will eventually acquire "feelings" in the sense that it will thrash around while the doctor is killing it)? How is this whole thought process grounded in anything but projections and sentiment?(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostI am all for encouraging homosexual couples to adopt, and support social programs as the budget allows. If you want to make more room for them by scrapping some tanks and other invade-brown-people-to-teach-them-our-values gear, fine by me. I'm a moderate, not a conservative. Anyway,
By your logic, every state would say, "welp, it's illegal in the next state, why bother?" and it would be legal everywhere. I know that's what you want, but it makes no sense from our perspective.
BTW, what counts as a "brain" for abortion purposes? Two neurons? Eight? Thirty-two? A couple of thousand? None of those will allow for anything even approaching awareness AFAIK, but provided they're inside the skull or what will later turn into it, you could call them a brain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostThank you for your condescension. Am I to take it that totally thoughtless, reflexive reactions are what make us human?
I apologise. I am trying to understand where you are coming from. I was interpreting what seems to be refusal to consider other moral viewpoints as a logical or rhetorical excercise.
But, yes. Thoughtless, reflexive reactions are used as sign posts for the legal and ethical protection of human life. Once again, they are used in determining brain death.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
I can see two definite bright lines.
Brain function is one. Viability outside the womb is another. These are milestones.
I suspect you will say, 'no, they are pebbles.' I would then say that we are looking at a beach, not a rock slide.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
We should probably just call it quits here, since I'm giving up Poly for Lent in, uh...2.5 hours. I'm sorry, but I can't conceive of how a temporary inability of a fetus/embryo/whatever to meet a certain benchmark (which it's working quite furiously to achieve) can justify killing it. If my mother had had an abortion in January of 1983 (I was born in late August), would it have been me she killed? Undeniably. There was nobody else there to kill. I wasn't switched in for that little lump of cells. I was that lump of cells, and for ten years it had been legal to kill me. What can you say to dissuade me, to convince me that it would have been somebody/something else dying in there? I don't think you can. It was me.
Comment
-
I would ague that the fetus became you, but I know what you mean.
I hope you find something else to give up for Lent, but if not, see you on the flip."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Exactly, it's one small step from banning contraceptives. However, Elok has already made it clear that he is against that as well. A shame we won't be able to read his stretch of logic to justify it.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostThe only thing there was an unfeeling lump of cells. It would have been no different, from your perspective, from never being conceived at all.
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostI would ague that the fetus became you, but I know what you mean.
I hope you find something else to give up for Lent, but if not, see you on the flip.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostSame thing if you blew my brains out with a .45 while I was sleeping. Barring a conscious afterlife (which you don't believe in and isn't the focus of earthly law), I'd never know I'd died. I don't think that makes it right.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostIt's good for me to take a break, have forty days to focus on what's important and detox the accumulated snark out of my system. See you around, my man, and thanks to the rest for a fairly civil, albeit spirited, debate. Sadly, BK will return around the same time I do, and we will be having a discussion that starts this way and ends with whether or not Thomas Aquinas considered it rape when the woman was wearing makeup.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostWe should probably just call it quits here, since I'm giving up Poly for Lent in, uh...2.5 hours. I'm sorry, but I can't conceive of how a temporary inability of a fetus/embryo/whatever to meet a certain benchmark (which it's working quite furiously to achieve) can justify killing it. If my mother had had an abortion in January of 1983 (I was born in late August), would it have been me she killed? Undeniably. There was nobody else there to kill. I wasn't switched in for that little lump of cells. I was that lump of cells, and for ten years it had been legal to kill me. What can you say to dissuade me, to convince me that it would have been somebody/something else dying in there? I don't think you can. It was me.
OK. Good luck with your observance.
I suspect we will have to agree to disagree about a few things. I appreciate your efforts to be understood and I've tried to understand, for what it's worth.
We would agree about some things though. One would be that unrestricted access to abortion in any situation and at any time is not something we want to see.(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View Postand I don't believe that people commit crimes because they don't get welfare.
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostBut no, I'm not a political conservative, nor I'm I really conservative religiously, but people call me that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostYour views are pretty consistently aligned with the conservatives“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
Comment