Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another violent Islamic reaction

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Oerdin View Post
    In the 1970's the previous king of Jordan called Palestinians rats which should be exterminated when they attempted a coupe against his government. Face it, not even your fellow Arabs want anything to do with your violent and criminal people. They won't touch that tar baby with a ten foot pole. Laugh it up but it is completely true. None of them want you, Albert Speer.
    WTF is a tar baby? Is this like when you went on a racist tirade about ethnic pizza makers?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View Post
      What the ****? The current King is Abdullah II. And, yes, he married Queen Rania, a Palestinian but I'm talking about HIS father, King Hussein, who ruled Jordan from 1952 to 1999. King Hussein married Queen Alia, a Palestinian, as his third wife.

      Holy **** are you so ****ing wrong.
      I'm so right and you know it. He hated Palestinians for trying to over throw him and only made alliance with them after words when it became clear the Palestinians breed like rats and where going to become the majority in Jordan. That's when he shifted his position. It was entirely political and designed to allow his family to hold on to their royal position. He continually lamented allowing violent and crime prone Palestinians into his country and said the only country which did worse was Lebanon because Lebanon took in even more of those violent Palestinian criminals. The other Arab leaders took this lesson to heart and refused to allow violent Palestinian criminals into their countries.
      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        WTF is a tar baby? Is this like when you went on a racist tirade about ethnic pizza makers?
        Uneducated rube. A tar baby means something which once you touch you can't let go because it sticks to you. Much like violent criminal Palestinian populations. Thus why other Arab states refuse to admit Palestinians and want nothing to do with them.

        Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Oerdin View Post
          Uneducated rube. A tar baby means something which once you touch you can't let go because it sticks to you. Much like violent criminal Palestinian populations. Thus why other Arab states refuse to admit Palestinians and want nothing to do with them.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_baby
          In US English the expression tar baby is also used occasionally as a derogatory term for black people (in the U.S. it refers to African-Americans), or a particularly dark-skinned person.
          Wow, Oerdin. First you called the arabs "sand ******s" in the pizza thread, now you're calling them "tar babies".

          Comment


          • #65
            You really are a dumb ass. It means something you touch which you cannot then put down because it sticks to you. Noob.
            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by gribbler View Post
              WTF is a tar baby? Is this like when you went on a racist tirade about ethnic pizza makers?
              "Flutie was better than Kelly, Elway, Esiason and Cunningham." - Ben Kenobi
              "I have nothing against Wilson, but he's nowhere near the same calibre of QB as Flutie. Flutie threw for 5k+ yards in the CFL." -Ben Kenobi

              Comment


              • #67
                Palestinians are black? That explains why I don't care about their plight.
                John Brown did nothing wrong.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Oerdin never ceases to amaze and amuse me with new displays of vitriolic racism.
                  If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                  ){ :|:& };:

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    So when Roosevelt and Bush Sr used it it was clearly not the common definition but some absurd regionalism confined to only to the deep south which no one out side of the deep south used? Got it, you ******. Clearly, when anyone speaks of a raccoon they're not talking about the wild animal which 90%+ of English language speakers use that world to describe but instead they're refering to the the obscure usage only found in deepest dumb****astan (Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia). Do you ever get tired of being wrong and looking stupid? Look at the common usage not the deep south usage especially since I have nothing but contempt for all things southern. That at least should be clear.
                    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                      Oerdin never ceases to amaze and amuse me with new displays of vitriolic racism.
                      And you never cease to amaze me with how ****ing stupid you are. I mean, you never get anything right.
                      Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        zing!
                        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                        ){ :|:& };:

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          Oerdin never ceases to amaze and amuse me with new displays of vitriolic racism.
                          Yeah, what's with these sweeping condemnations of all Palestinians as violent criminals? This is worse than the time someone called them "goat ****ers".

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Gee, I guess it must mean the obscure coloqueal usage from the deep south instead of the definition which even the dictionary lists as the primary definition. I mean, I'm so obviously a student of the deep south and don't constantly list everything southern as a cause for derision. Instead, Albie googling an obscure and archiac usage simply must be correct when in fact Albery Speet is a drooling idiot who can't follow anything without first googling it.
                            Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by gribbler View Post
                              Yeah, what's with these sweeping condemnations of all Palestinians as violent criminals? This is worse than the time someone called them "goat ****ers".
                              Palestinians are simply one of the most violent and crime prone socienties on Earth judged by their crime stats. That's simply a fact, you mental midget, no matter how much you want to deny it. Unless you think they don't have one of the highest violent crime rates, that they aren't one of the most engaged societies with terrorism, that they haven't tried to violently over throw governments, or that their fellow Arabs haven't done everything possible to exclude them from their counties because they hate Palestinians, consider them terrorists & criminals, and truly don't want Palestinians in their countries.
                              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                You've been known to use racial slurs before. I think mistaking something you wrote for a racial slur is reasonable.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X