Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Isaac Asimov's Foundation: A Roland Emmerich Film

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I liked I, Robot (with Will Smith, right?). It was nothing like the books but it was fun to watch...
    If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
    ){ :|:& };:

    Comment


    • #17
      Foundation, Foundation and Empire, and Second Foundation are Sci Fi masterpieces.


      This movie will suck donkey balls.
      Libraries are state sanctioned, so they're technically engaged in privateering. - Felch
      I thought we're trying to have a serious discussion? It says serious in the thread title!- Al. B. Sure

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by BeBro View Post
        It will be a cineastic masterpiece, like "I, Robot".
        I, Robot that should have been given a different name as it has nothing to do with Asimovs' robot series except for also having robots. It might as well have been named Mechwarrior Detective.
        It might be possible to make an intelligent sci-fi movie. I think that the makers of BSG and Caprica might be able to do a decent job. There are others out there that deserve a shot as well. I think Tony or Ridley Scott might be able to do a good job as well. But the foundation series requires a depth that the make of independence does not have.
        What can make a nigga wanna fight a whole night club/Figure that he ought to maybe be a pimp simply 'cause he don't like love/What can make a nigga wanna achy, break all rules/In a book when it took a lot to get you hooked up to this volume/
        What can make a nigga wanna loose all faith in/Anything that he can't feel through his chest wit sensation

        Comment


        • #19
          Let's be clear here, though--Independence Day was ****in' awesome.
          If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
          ){ :|:& };:

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by BeBro View Post
            It will be a cineastic masterpiece, like "I, Robot".

            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Thoth View Post
              Foundation, Foundation and Empire, and Second Foundation are Sci Fi masterpieces.


              This movie will suck donkey balls.
              I'm afraid that your prediction are right. (did you use math to get to that conclusion ?)
              With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

              Steven Weinberg

              Comment


              • #22
                The movie known as "I, Robot," like many other movies (such as all three Die Hard sequels) originally had nothing to do with the intellectual property of its title. It just had the name tacked on for a low cost afterwards, to add name recognition. Come to think of it, this is actually even dumber than the Paradise Lost movie. While almost nobody has read PL, lots of people recognize and will remember the name. Most of the people who have heard of Foundation at all have read the books, liked them, and know that they bear no resemblance to anything we will see in the trailers.

                Oh, but I was forgetting about the upcoming "whitewashed" version of Akira set in NYC. So Foundation is still the second-goofiest studio decision still in development. PL is third. The Battleship movie would be fourth, but sadly I suspect the ruse will work there and people will actually see the stupid thing.
                1011 1100
                Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Thoth View Post
                  Foundation, Foundation and Empire, and Second Foundation are Sci Fi masterpieces.


                  This movie will suck mule balls.
                  Corrected and agreed.
                  There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                    Yes, the super man (as it were - more super mutant) who throws a wrench into Seldon's mathematical predictions.



                    Because he does it based on math (laws of mass action), basically. The idea is that his math shows that no individual can really change history, but it will continue on a preset course based on group dynamics. This does wonderfully until the Mule shows up (who has the psychic ability to alter people's emotions).
                    Save for the fact that the managers of the mathematical models likewise intervene in order to restore the least disruptive path for humanity using their own version of mind controlling powers. In doing so break their own version of the 'prime directive'. (an implicit understanding that one "psychically/charismatically gifted" individual could make humanity deviate from the mathematically modeled outcomes. Gentle nudging without overt interference to maintain the desired outcome was always assumed to be employed)

                    As for psycho history it is akin to Keynsian economic models on steroids.

                    In fact the first application of the psycho historical approach was a project the Emperor comissioned Seldon to evaluate the effect of tax code (and complexity thereof) on civilizational progress/decline.

                    Lastly, the liklihood this movie will be worth watching is practically nil as the concepts dont translate well into modern film.
                    Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe; October 1, 2011, 20:09.
                    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Pax View Post
                      I, Robot that should have been given a different name as it has nothing to do with Asimovs' robot series except for also having robots. It might as well have been named Mechwarrior Detective.
                      It might be possible to make an intelligent sci-fi movie. I think that the makers of BSG and Caprica might be able to do a decent job. There are others out there that deserve a shot as well. I think Tony or Ridley Scott might be able to do a good job as well. But the foundation series requires a depth that the make of independence does not have.
                      It did postulate the laws of robotics to an extent and had a murder mystery involving a robot, but beyond that had nothing in common with Asimov's original classic.
                      "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                      “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe View Post
                        As for psycho history it is akin to Keynsian economic models on steroids.
                        Keynesian? So other types of macroeconomic models don't attempt to make predictions about how large number of people behave?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          It had the commonality that the individual was unimportant to the model, similar to the keynsian philosophy that the economy is a machine. Ultimately the series undermines that premise in the introduction of the Mule and the understanding that the psychohistorical models are in essence a rigged game maintained by extraordinary individuals.
                          "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                          “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            It had the commonality that the individual was unimportant to the model, similar to the keynsian philosophy that the economy is a machine.


                            This is gibberish.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by BeBro View Post
                              It will be a cineastic masterpiece, like "I, Robot".
                              the movie was basically "robots and empire."

                              Giskard postulated the zeroth law of robotics, and R. Daneel Olivaw shows up somewhere along the way if i remember correctly. the movie "I, Robot" basically an exploration of the zeroth law. it also only claims to be inspired by "I, Robot." (or as suggested by i can't remember which). if one goes into the movie thinking about only robots, and the three laws, it's not shabby.
                              I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
                              [Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                                Let's be clear here, though--Independence Day was ****in' awesome.
                                ...how long ago did you last see it? It's most interesting for its insight into Hollywood's view of the world: Jews think of all the solutions, Black people do all the work, Mexicans are there to be sacrificed and a generic-looking White is there to take credit for everything at the end.

                                EDIT: And yeah, I know, that was Bill Pullman, AKA Lone Starr. But he was playing Generic White Guy.
                                Last edited by Elok; October 1, 2011, 23:34.
                                1011 1100
                                Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X